Is Overlain Display a Right Choice for AR Navigation? A Qualitative Study of Head-Mounted Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation on Accuracy for Large-Scale Clinical Deployment
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Head-mounted augmented reality surgical navigation (HMARSN) systems with overlain display (OD) are not ready for widespread clinical use. Their system accuracy is highly variable and user-dependent, making them unreliable for surgical procedures.
Area Of Science
- Medical Technology
- Surgical Navigation
- Augmented Reality
Background
- Head-mounted augmented reality surgical navigation (HMARSN) systems are increasingly used in surgery.
- Overlain display (OD) HMARSN systems offer intuitive views but have accuracy challenges.
- System accuracy is critical but difficult to measure objectively in HMARSN.
Purpose Of The Study
- To qualitatively review experimental OD HMARSN systems.
- To investigate the impact of overlain display on system accuracy.
- To assess the suitability of OD HMARSN for large-scale clinical deployment.
Main Methods
- Systematic literature search of PubMed and ScienceDirect.
- Analysis of 60 selected papers on HMARSN systems.
- Focus on accuracy definition, measurement, stability, and competitiveness.
Main Results
- OD HMARSN system accuracy is significantly impacted by user-specific eye-to-surgical-field transformations.
- These transformations are individualized, user-dependent, and potentially unstable during surgery.
- Current OD HMARSN systems exhibit variable accuracy compared to commercial systems.
Conclusions
- OD HMARSN system accuracy is compromised by subjective and unstable spatial transformations.
- The user-dependent nature of accuracy measurements hinders reliability.
- OD HMARSN systems are currently not suitable for large-scale clinical implementation.

