Beyond the Dailey-Townes Model: Chemical Information from the Electric Field Gradient

In this work, we reexamine the Dailey-Townes model by systematically investigating the electric field gradient (EFG) in various chlorine compounds, dihalogens, and the uranyl ion ($$). Through the use of relativistic molecular calculations and projection analysis, we decompose the EFG expectation value in terms of atomic reference orbitals. We show how the Dailey-Townes model can be seen as an approximation to our projection analysis. Moreover, we observe for the chlorine compounds that, in general, the Dailey-Townes model deviates from the total EFG value. We show that the main reason for this is that the Dailey-Townes model does not account for contributions from the mixing of valence p-orbitals with subvalence ones. We also find a non-negligible contribution from core polarization. This can be interpreted as Sternheimer shielding, as discussed in an appendix. The predictions of the Dailey-Townes model are improved by replacing net populations with gross ones, but we have not found any theoretical justification for this. Subsequently, for the molecular systems X-Cl (where X = I, At, and Ts), we find that with the inclusion of spin-orbit interaction, the (electronic) EFG operator is no longer diagonal within an atomic shell, which is incompatible with the Dailey-Townes model. Finally, we examine the EFG at the uranium position in $$, where we find that about half the EFG comes from core polarization. The other half comes from the combination of the U≡O bonds and the U(6p) orbitals, the latter mostly nonbonding, in particular with spin-orbit interaction included. The analysis was carried out with molecular orbitals localized according to the Pipek-Mezey criterion. Surprisingly, we observed that core orbitals are also rotated during this localization procedure, even though they are fully localized. We show in an appendix that, using this localization criterion, it is actually allowed.