Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Rheumatoid Arthritis Research Through HR-pQCT Imaging Analysis
Published on: October 6, 2023
Identifying people at risk of rheumatoid arthritis in primary care: a qualitative study
Anna M Anderson1, Suzanne Richards1, Caroline Flurey2
1Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Background:
Identification of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in primary care is challenging and often delayed. Anticyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibody testing of people presenting to primary care with new-onset musculoskeletal symptoms without synovitis could help address this; those testing positive are at increased risk of developing RA.
Aim:
To explore how primary care clinicians currently identify and refer patients with suspected RA, and the behaviours required to implement a prediction model for guiding targeted anti-CCP testing for non-specific musculoskeletal symptoms in primary care.
Design And Setting:
A qualitative descriptive study in primary care in England.
Method:
Eight GPs and eight musculoskeletal First Contact Practitioners (physiotherapists) participated in semi-structured interviews to explore their experiences of identifying and/or referring patients with suspected RA, and their views of a implementation package for the anti-CCP prediction model. Data were analysed using framework analysis.
Results:
Variations in practice were evident across the pathway for identifying and/or referring patients with suspected RA, including in access to and use of the anti-CCP test. Implementing the anti-CCP prediction model would require clinicians to believe its benefits outweigh its risks, engagement of primary and secondary care teams, and incorporation of the prediction model within an easily accessible and useable clinical-decision support system. Participants' views about implementing the anti-CCP prediction model varied but were mostly positive overall.
Conclusion:
Implementing a prediction model to guide targeted anti-CCP testing in primary care could be feasible. Further research is required to explore the potential benefits, risks, and costs of a pathway for identifying and/or managing people at risk of RA.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease IV: Nursing Management

