Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2025

Apparatus for Harvesting Tissue Microcolumns
Published on: October 25, 2018
Endolift® is a non-surgical treatment for skin tissue conditions. Is there evidence for its application?
Débora Aparecida Oliveira Modena1,2, Aline Pedro de Melo Yamamoto3, Thaís Bruna Ferreira da Silva3,4
1Department of Health Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation and Functional Performance, University of São Paulo, Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, 14040-900, Brazil. de_modena@yahoo.com.br.
Abstract:
The Endolift® technique, introduced in 2005, gained popularity among medical and non-medical professionals as a non-surgical approach using subdermal laser devices. However, its widespread adoption lacked a thorough understanding of its physiological interaction, resulting in controversies over its effectiveness and safety. This study aimed to assess the evidence of Endolift® efficacy, parametrization, and safety by analyzing adverse events. A systematic literature review was conducted by searching the following databases: NCBI/PubMed, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Library. These searches resulted in 111 articles. Seven articles were selected after removing duplicates and screening titles, abstracts, and full texts. These articles exhibited a high risk of bias, a lack of standardization in treatment parameters, and reports of adverse events that did not align with clinical reality, often occurring with off-label use.In conclusion, due to insufficient high-quality research and inconsistent indications and parameter adjustments, asserting the efficacy and safety of Endolift® is challenging. Randomized studies are recommended to curb indiscriminate use, which may compromise patient safety. This analysis underscores the importance of evidence-based clinical practices for patient safety and ethical treatment.

