Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026
![Semi-quantitative Assessment Using [18F]FDG Tracer in Patients with Severe Brain Injury](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F58641.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
Semi-quantitative Assessment Using [18F]FDG Tracer in Patients with Severe Brain Injury
Published on: November 9, 2018
Cross-modality PET image synthesis for Parkinson's Disease diagnosis: a leap from [18F]FDG to [11C]CFT
Zhenrong Shen1, Jing Wang2,3,4, Haolin Huang5
1School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Purpose:
Dopamine transporter [11C]CFT PET is highly effective for diagnosing Parkinson's Disease (PD), whereas it is not widely available in most hospitals. To develop a deep learning framework to synthesize [11C]CFT PET images from real [18F]FDG PET images and leverage their cross-modal correlation to distinguish PD from normal control (NC).
Methods:
We developed a deep learning framework to synthesize [11C]CFT PET images from real [18F]FDG PET images, and leveraged their cross-modal correlation to distinguish PD from NC. A total of 604 participants (274 with PD and 330 with NC) who underwent [11C]CFT and [18F]FDG PET scans were included. The quality of the synthetic [11C]CFT PET images was evaluated through quantitative comparison with the ground-truth images and radiologist visual assessment. The evaluations of PD diagnosis performance were conducted using biomarker-based quantitative analyses (using striatal binding ratios from synthetic [11C]CFT PET images) and the proposed PD classifier (incorporating both real [18F]FDG and synthetic [11C]CFT PET images).
Results:
Visualization result shows that the synthetic [11C]CFT PET images resemble the real ones with no significant differences visible in the error maps. Quantitative evaluation demonstrated that synthetic [11C]CFT PET images exhibited a high peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR: 25.0-28.0) and structural similarity (SSIM: 0.87-0.96) across different unilateral striatal subregions. The radiologists achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 91.9% (± 2.02%) based on synthetic [11C]CFT PET images, while biomarker-based quantitative analysis of the posterior putamen yielded an AUC of 0.912 (95% CI, 0.889-0.936), and the proposed PD Classifier achieved an AUC of 0.937 (95% CI, 0.916-0.957).
Conclusion:
By bridging the gap between [18F]FDG and [11C]CFT, our deep learning framework can significantly enhance PD diagnosis without the need for [11C]CFT tracers, thereby expanding the reach of advanced diagnostic tools to clinical settings where [11C]CFT PET imaging is inaccessible.
Related Concept Videos
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body being...
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET

