Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2025

12:03
In Vivo Model for Testing Effect of Hypoxia on Tumor Metastasis
Published on: December 9, 2016
12.4K
Intensified Induction Therapy for Newly Diagnosed, Localized Skeletal Ewing Sarcoma (ISG/AIEOP EW-1): A Randomized,
Roberto Luksch1, Emanuela Palmerini2, Giuseppe Maria Milano3
1Pediatric Oncology Unit and Biostatistics for Clinical Research Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
|January 20, 2025
Summary
Intensive induction chemotherapy for Ewing sarcoma is as effective as standard treatment, offering a shorter duration. This approach demonstrated non-inferiority in event-free survival, despite increased toxicities in some cases.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Oncology
- Medical Oncology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Treatment intensity impacts outcomes in Ewing sarcoma.
- Standard treatment for non-metastatic Ewing sarcoma is 37 weeks.
- An intensive, shorter chemotherapy regimen (25 weeks) was evaluated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the non-inferiority of an intensive, shorter induction chemotherapy regimen compared to standard treatment for localized Ewing sarcoma.
- To evaluate event-free survival (EFS) and toxicity profiles of both treatment arms.
Main Methods:
- A national, multicenter, randomized, phase III non-inferiority trial.
- 233 patients with localized Ewing sarcoma were randomized into standard (Arm A) and intensive (Arm B) arms.
- Treatment arms differed in consolidation therapy duration for good responders.
Main Results:
- Arm B (intensive) was non-inferior to Arm A (standard) with 5-year EFS of 77.5% vs. 71.6%.
- Good responders were higher in Arm B (62.5%) compared to Arm A (54.9%).
- Arm B showed higher rates of Grade ≥3 hematological, gastrointestinal, and cardiovascular toxicities.
Conclusions:
- Intensive induction chemotherapy is non-inferior to standard therapy for 5-year EFS in localized Ewing sarcoma.
- The intensive regimen offers a shorter treatment plan, particularly beneficial for good responders.
- Increased toxicity in the intensive arm requires careful consideration against the benefits of a shorter treatment duration.

