Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 1, 2025

Author Spotlight: Real-Time Imaging of Bonding in 3D-Printed Layers
04:36

Author Spotlight: Real-Time Imaging of Bonding in 3D-Printed Layers

Published on: September 1, 2023

3.1K

Ultrasonic characterization of 3D-printed polymer objects.

Timoteo F de Oliveira1, André C M Cavalheiro1, F Buiochi1

  • 1Department of Mechatronics and Mechanical Systems Engineering, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Ultrasonics
|January 21, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the Implicit Representation of the Electrical Impedance Tomography Inverse Problem.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

Viscoelastic characterization of liquids using ultrasonic shear-waves generated by the internal reflection approach.

Ultrasonics·2025
Same author

Validation of a three-dimensional model for improving the design of multiple-backscattering ultrasonic sensors.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025
Same author

Determination of Partial Propagation Velocity and Partial Isentropic Compressibility Coefficient in Water-Ethanol System.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Error analysis of self-compensated ultrasound measurements of the thickness loss due to corrosion in pipe walls.

Ultrasonics·2024
Same author

Water content monitoring in water-in-oil emulsions using a delay line cell.

Ultrasonics·2023
Same journal

CFREE-uPIV: A contrast-free resolution-enhanced ultrasound particle image velocimetry for rapid microvascular flow imaging.

Ultrasonics·2026
Same journal

Ultrasonic-induced nucleation kinetics in directed energy deposition.

Ultrasonics·2026
Same journal

Grain size evaluation in polycrystalline materials using the interference effect of bounded ultrasonic beams at the Rayleigh critical angle.

Ultrasonics·2026
Same journal

Ultrasonic characterization of functionally graded materials using a continuously graded model and spectral inversion.

Ultrasonics·2026
Same journal

Frequency-wavenumber domain inversion for arterial viscoelasticity.

Ultrasonics·2026
Same journal

Pressure- and frequency-dependent acoustic behavior of second-generation acoustic reporter genes-expressing bacteria for optimized ultrasound imaging.

Ultrasonics·2026
See all related articles

Ultrasonic testing reveals vat photopolymerization 3D printing produces superior, low-porosity parts compared to material extrusion. This impacts mechanical and acoustic properties, crucial for applications like ultrasonic lenses.

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Additive Manufacturing
  • Ultrasonic Testing

Background:

  • 3D printing (Additive Manufacturing) offers versatile prototyping but mechanical properties vary with materials and techniques.
  • Understanding these properties is key for optimizing 3D-printed component performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize mechanical and acoustic properties of 3D-printed polymers using ultrasonic testing.
  • To compare material extrusion and vat photopolymerization techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized ultrasonic testing to evaluate seven polymer materials (nylon, PET-G, flexible polymer, polycarbonate, ABS, PLA, photopolymer resin).
  • Analyzed samples produced via material extrusion and vat photopolymerization.
  • Performed microscopic analysis to assess sample porosity.
Keywords:
3D printingAcoustical characterizationAdditive manufacturingPolymer

More Related Videos

Stereolithographic 3D Printing with Renewable Acrylates
08:28

Stereolithographic 3D Printing with Renewable Acrylates

Published on: September 12, 2018

9.4K
Characterizing Dissipative Elastic Metamaterials Produced by Additive Manufacturing
09:39

Characterizing Dissipative Elastic Metamaterials Produced by Additive Manufacturing

Published on: June 28, 2024

831

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2025

Author Spotlight: Real-Time Imaging of Bonding in 3D-Printed Layers
04:36

Author Spotlight: Real-Time Imaging of Bonding in 3D-Printed Layers

Published on: September 1, 2023

3.1K
Stereolithographic 3D Printing with Renewable Acrylates
08:28

Stereolithographic 3D Printing with Renewable Acrylates

Published on: September 12, 2018

9.4K
Characterizing Dissipative Elastic Metamaterials Produced by Additive Manufacturing
09:39

Characterizing Dissipative Elastic Metamaterials Produced by Additive Manufacturing

Published on: June 28, 2024

831

Main Results:

  • Vat photopolymerization yielded high-quality samples with minimal dimensional deviations and low porosity, indicating homogeneity.
  • Material extrusion samples exhibited significant porosity (gaps between filaments), impacting mechanical and acoustic properties.
  • Ultrasonic testing determined key parameters like Young's modulus, shear modulus, acoustic impedance, and absorption.

Conclusions:

  • Vat photopolymerization is superior for producing dimensionally stable and homogeneous 3D-printed parts.
  • Material extrusion's porosity negatively affects mechanical and acoustic performance.
  • Findings aid in designing enhanced ultrasonic lenses and lab-on-a-chip devices.