Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2025

06:18
Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions
Published on: April 5, 2024
951
Under-representation for Female Pelvis Cancers in Commercial Auto-segmentation Solutions and Open-source Imaging
M Thor1, V Williams2, C Hajj2
1Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, USA.
Summary
AI auto-segmentation tools and datasets show significant gender disparity, favoring male anatomy. This imbalance in artificial intelligence solutions for organs at risk may impact radiation therapy for female patients.
Area of Science:
- Medical imaging and radiation therapy
- Artificial intelligence in healthcare
- Gender representation in medical technology
Background:
- Artificial intelligence (AI) based auto-segmentation is increasingly used in radiation therapy (RT) workflows.
- Commercial solutions for organs at risk (OARs) and open-source datasets are vital for training AI algorithms.
- The equitable representation of female and male anatomies in these AI solutions is not well-studied.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the representation of female and male anatomies in commercially available AI auto-segmentation solutions for OARs.
- To assess the availability of open-source imaging datasets for training AI algorithms across genders.
- To identify potential gender disparities in AI-driven RT tools.
Main Methods:
- Inquiries were sent to eight vendors about their gender-specific OAR auto-segmentation solutions.
- The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) was screened for publicly available female and male anatomy imaging datasets.
- Data on solution availability, release dates, and OAR segmentation presence were analyzed.
Main Results:
- All vendors offered male pelvis AI auto-segmentation; 5/8 offered female pelvis solutions.
- Female breast and pelvis solutions were released later than male pelvis solutions (median 0.6 and 2.3 years, respectively).
- TCIA datasets predominantly featured male pelvis data with OAR segmentations, while female datasets lacked OAR segmentations.
Conclusions:
- Commercial AI auto-segmentation solutions and open-source datasets show a notable bias towards male anatomy.
- This gender disparity in AI tools and data may perpetuate inequities in radiation therapy.
- Addressing this imbalance is crucial for equitable cancer care across genders.

