The steps that young people and suicide prevention professionals think the social media industry and policymakers should take to improve online safety. A nested cross-sectional study within a Delphi consensus approach
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Young people and suicide prevention experts largely agreed on restricting online self-harm content and implementing clear policies. Collaboration between social media companies, policymakers, and governments is crucial for improving online safety.
Area Of Science
- Public Health
- Digital Health
- Mental Health Research
Background
- Growing concerns link social media use to youth self-harm and suicide.
- Existing social media safety strategies require evaluation for effectiveness.
Purpose Of The Study
- Assess agreement between young people and suicide prevention experts on current social media safety measures.
- Identify further steps for social media companies and policymakers to enhance online safety for youth.
Main Methods
- Cross-sectional survey nested within a Delphi expert consensus study.
- Systematic literature review and stakeholder roundtables informed questionnaire development.
- Two expert panels (youth and professionals) participated; 43 youth and 23 professionals completed the survey.
Main Results
- Limited consensus on the utility of current social media safety strategies.
- Strong agreement on restricting self-harm/suicide content and establishing clear company policies.
- Moderate support for AI-driven resource delivery and government regulation; strong support for school education and international collaboration.
Conclusions
- Balancing online risks and benefits of self-harm/suicide communication is complex.
- Enhanced collaboration between policymakers, the social media industry, and international bodies is essential for online safety.
Related Concept Videos
A modern form of aggression is bullying. As you learn in your study of child development, socializing and playing with other children is beneficial for children’s psychological development. However, as you may have experienced as a child, not all play behavior has positive outcomes. Some children are aggressive and want to play roughly. Other children are selfish and do not want to share toys. One form of negative social interactions among children that has become a national concern is...
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
History
In the late 1800s, social psychologist Gustave Le Bon first posited the hypothesis that an individual’s behavior can differ between being in a crowd...
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
The phenomenon of group polarization explains many actions taken by groups that...
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
Asch’s Original Study
Solomon Asch conducted several experiments in the 1950s to determine how people are affected by the thoughts and behaviors of other people. In one study, a group of participants was shown a series of printed line segments of different lengths: a, b, and c. Participants were then shown a fourth line segment: x. They...
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
A good example of social proof is from laugh tracks on television shows. Fullery & Skeffington (1974) found that adding group laughter sounds to material increased how humorous the participants perceived that material, regardless of whether the content itself was funny or not. By adding a laugh...
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
Identify the ethical problem and dilemma: Begin by recognizing the presence of an ethical issue. An ethical dilemma arises when conflicting moral principles or values necessitate choosing between two or more equally...

