AI predicting recurrence in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: systematic review with study strengths and weaknesses

  • 0School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

|

|

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) show promise for predicting non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) recurrence, outperforming traditional methods. Further research is needed to improve model generalisability and clinical integration for better patient management.

Area Of Science

  • Oncological Urology
  • Medical Artificial Intelligence
  • Precision Oncology

Background

  • Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) has a high recurrence rate (70-80%), leading to significant patient burden and high management costs.
  • Current NMIBC recurrence prediction tools often overestimate risk and lack accuracy.
  • Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) offer enhanced predictive precision by integrating molecular and clinical data.

Purpose Of The Study

  • To critically review ML-based frameworks for predicting NMIBC recurrence.
  • To analyze the statistical robustness and algorithmic efficacy of existing ML models.
  • To identify strengths, weaknesses, and limitations of ML applications in NMIBC recurrence prediction.

Main Methods

  • Systematic literature search focusing on ML frameworks for NMIBC recurrence prediction.
  • Categorization of studies by data modalities (radiomics, clinical, histopathological, genomic) and ML model types (neural networks, deep learning, random forests).
  • Analysis of studies for statistical robustness, algorithmic efficacy, performance metrics, generalisability, interpretability, and cost-effectiveness.

Main Results

  • ML algorithms show significant potential, with neural networks achieving 65-97.5% accuracy, especially with multi-modal datasets.
  • Multi-modal data integration consistently outperforms single-modality approaches.
  • Challenges include limited generalisability due to small datasets and the 'black-box' nature of advanced models; explainability methods like SHAP show promise but need refinement.

Conclusions

  • ML and AI hold substantial promise for improving NMIBC recurrence prediction and advancing precision oncology.
  • Optimizing multimodal data utilization and enhancing model explainability are crucial for clinical adoption.
  • Further research and robust datasets are necessary to translate ML advancements into tangible patient benefits.