Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Archival Research

Archival Research

Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...

Naturalistic Observations

Naturalistic Observations

If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...

Ethics in Research

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

Group Design

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Directional Symptom Dependencies in Multiple Sclerosis and Parkinson's Disease: A Comparative Bayesian Network Analysis.

Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare·2026

Same author

Guidance for Grading the Evidence in Quantitative Umbrella Reviews.

Journal of evidence-based medicine·2026

Same author

A systematic review of qualitative research exploring resilience in Academia.

International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being·2026

Same author

Updating the PRISMA reporting guideline for scoping reviews: a scoping review.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Same author

A scoping review of palliative care assessment tools.

BMC palliative care·2026

Same author

Managing transitions: a qualitative study of undergraduate international nursing students' experience of a mentoring program.

BMC medical education·2026

Same journal

From Ineligible to Transplanted: Heath and Cost benefits of Treatment Optimisation of HFrEF in Dialysis Patients.

European journal of cardiovascular nursing·2026

Same journal

Nurse-Led, Technology-Based Interventions to Improve Self-Care in Heart Failure Patients After Hospital Discharge: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

European journal of cardiovascular nursing·2026

Same journal

Gamification in healthcare registries: lessons for long-term institutional implementation.

European journal of cardiovascular nursing·2026

Same journal

Matching the outcome to the mechanism: what the psychosocial signal in SOPHROCARE teaches us.

European journal of cardiovascular nursing·2026

Same journal

Process evaluation of the Integrated Cardiac Rehabilitation Program Employing Smartphone Technology (I-CREST) for coronary heart disease management.

European journal of cardiovascular nursing·2026

Same journal

Feasibility and Process Evaluation of CArdiac Brief INtervention (CABIN) in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Mixed-Method, Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial.

European journal of cardiovascular nursing·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

Umbrella reviews: a methodological guide.

Ritin Fernandez^1,2, Amir Masoud Sharifnia³, Hanan Khalil⁴

¹School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.

European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

|January 23, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Umbrella reviews synthesize multiple systematic reviews, advancing evidence-based practice and policy. This comprehensive method enhances decision-making in healthcare and beyond.

Keywords:

Decision-making Evidence synthesis Meta-analyses Methodology Policy-making Systematic reviews Umbrella reviews

More Related Videos

Assessing the Particulate Matter Removal Abilities of Tree Leaves

Assessing the Particulate Matter Removal Abilities of Tree Leaves

Published on: October 7, 2018

A Method for Quantifying Foliage-Dwelling Arthropods

A Method for Quantifying Foliage-Dwelling Arthropods

Published on: October 20, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

Assessing the Particulate Matter Removal Abilities of Tree Leaves

Assessing the Particulate Matter Removal Abilities of Tree Leaves

Published on: October 7, 2018

A Method for Quantifying Foliage-Dwelling Arthropods

A Method for Quantifying Foliage-Dwelling Arthropods

Published on: October 20, 2019

Area of Science:

Evidence Synthesis
Health Research Methodology

Background:

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are foundational in evidence synthesis.
Umbrella reviews represent a methodological advancement, aggregating findings from multiple systematic reviews.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore the significance of umbrella reviews in evidence synthesis.
To emphasize their role in evidence-based practice and policy-making.

Main Methods:

Examination of the evolution of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Detailed explanation of umbrella review methodology: literature search, study selection, quality appraisal, and data synthesis.
Discussion of various umbrella review types and integration of advanced/interdisciplinary approaches.

Main Results:

Umbrella reviews offer a high-level aggregation of systematic reviews.
They enhance the comprehensiveness and effectiveness of evidence synthesis.
Integration of advanced methodologies and interdisciplinary approaches improves their utility.

Conclusions:

Umbrella reviews are essential tools for evidence synthesis.
They significantly inform clinical and policy decision-making.
Their evolving methodologies are crucial for the future of global evidence-based practice.