Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2025

Ohmic Contact Fabrication Using a Focused-ion Beam Technique and Electrical Characterization for Layer Semiconductor Nanostructures
Published on: December 5, 2015
Unraveling the Role of Interfacial Interactions in Electrical Contacts of Atomically Thin Transition-Metal
Meiying Gong1, Dabao Xie1, Yiqian Tian1
1College of Optical and Electronic Technology, China Jiliang University, 310018 Hangzhou, China.
Abstract:
Van der Waals (vdW) contact has been widely regarded as one of the most potential strategies for exploiting low-resistance metal-semiconductor junctions (MSJs) based on atomically thin transition-metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), but this method is still not efficient due to weak metal-TMD interfacial interactions. Therefore, an understanding of interfacial interactions between metals and TMDs is essential for achieving low-resistance contacts with weak Fermi level pinning (FLP). Herein, we report how the interfacial interactions between metals and TMDs affect the electrical contacts by considering more than 90 MSJs consisting of a semiconducting TMD channel and different types of metal electrodes, including bulk metals, MXenes, and metallic TMDs. We reveal that the vdW contact scheme cannot ensure the formation of low-resistance metal-TMD contacts. The interfacial coupling between metals and TMDs leads to a delicate competition between the FLP and carrier tunneling efficiency, which explains the broad experimental observations in which the weakly coupled van der Waals contacts usually show high contact resistance, while the strongly coupled metal-TMD contacts suffer from strong FLP. Benefiting from the low Schottky barrier and weak FLP, bulk Ag is a promising electrode for n-type MoS2 devices with a contact resistance of 83 Ω μm at a carrier concentration of 5.95 × 1013 cm-2, and 1T'-phase MoS2 and Sc2NO2 are identified as superior contact electrodes for p-type WSe2 devices. This work offers a general rule to exploit high-performance MSJs and clarifies the key role of interfacial coupling in the electrical contacts of TMD-based devices.
More Related Videos
10:41Preparation of Liquid-exfoliated Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Nanosheets with Controlled Size and Thickness: A State of the Art Protocol
Published on: December 20, 2016
08:50Preparation of Large-area Vertical 2D Crystal Hetero-structures Through the Sulfurization of Transition Metal Films for Device Fabrication
Published on: November 28, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Metal-Semiconductor Junctions
Schottky Barriers
Schottky barriers arise when a metal with a work function (Φm) contacts a semiconductor with a different work function (Φs). Initially, electrons transfer until the Fermi levels of the metal and semiconductor align at equilibrium. For instance, if Φm > Φs, the semiconductor Fermi level is higher than the metal's before contact. The...
Fermi Level Dynamics
Electron affinity in semiconductors refers to the energy gap between the minimum of its conduction band and the vacuum level and it is a critical parameter in determining how easily a semiconductor can accept additional electrons.
The work...
Interfacial Electrochemical Methods: Overview
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Van der Waals Interactions
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...