Pegloticase and Methotrexate Cotherapy in Patients With Uncontrolled Gout With Prior Pegloticase Monotherapy Failure:...

Patients with uncontrolled gout have few treatment options. Pegloticase lowers serum urate (SU) levels, but antidrug antibodies limit SU-lowering response and increase infusion reaction (IR) risk. Methotrexate (MTX) cotherapy increases pegloticase response rates and lowers IR risk in pegloticase-naïve patients. Therefore, the question of re-treating patients with previous pegloticase monotherapy failure has arisen. The ADVANCE open-label trial examined pegloticase plus MTX cotherapy efficacy and safety following pegloticase monotherapy failure.

Patients with uncontrolled gout (SU levels ≥6 mg/dL, oral urate-lowering therapy failure or intolerance, and ≥1 gout sign or symptom) who previously lost SU-lowering response to pegloticase monotherapy were included. Key exclusion criteria were moderate-to-severe IR or anaphylaxis to pegloticase, MTX contraindication, immunosuppressant administration, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, and estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73m². After a 6-week subcutaneous MTX run-in (at 25 mg/wk), patients entered 24-week pegloticase (at 8 mg biweekly) plus MTX treatment. The primary end point was SU-lowering response rate during month 6 (SU levels <6 mg/dL for ≥80% of weeks 20-24). Safety was assessed via adverse events (AEs) and laboratory monitoring.

Eleven patients began pegloticase plus MTX treatment (91% male patients, mean age 58.6 ± 11.3 years, mean ± SD SU levels 8.5 ± 3.2 mg/dL, 91% tophaceous). Previous pegloticase course was 2 to 27 infusions, with the last infusion admins being a mean ± SD of 3.7 ± 2.4 years before. One patient (9%) maintained response during month 6; 10 patients prematurely discontinued treatment (loss of SU lowering [n = 8], IR [n = 2]). Eight patients (73%) experienced ≥1 AE, most commonly gout flare. All AEs were mild or moderate.

Pegloticase plus MTX response rate following failed monotherapy was lower (9% vs 71%) and IR rate was higher (18% vs 4%) than in pegloticase-naïve patients. These findings demonstrate the challenge of overcoming established antipegloticase antibodies and emphasize the importance of initiating immunomodulation before the first pegloticase exposure.