Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Assessment of Vascular Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
Published on: June 16, 2014
Outcomes of chronic limb-threatening ischemia revascularization in patients with chronic kidney disease in the
Mahmoud B Malas1, Mohammed Hamouda1, Alik Farber2
1Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, UC San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA.
Insights
Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) face higher risks. Endovascular therapy in dialysis patients improved survival but increased reintervention rates.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Nephrology
- Cardiovascular Research
Background:
- Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) poses significant risks for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
- Outcomes of lower extremity revascularization in CLTI patients with varying CKD severity require detailed comparison.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare revascularization outcomes in CLTI patients stratified by CKD severity within the BEST-CLI trial.
- To identify a threshold estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) impacting major adverse limb events (MALEs) or all-cause mortality.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the BEST-CLI trial dataset, categorizing patients into three CKD groups (A: non-CKD/<3, B: 3-4, C: 5/dialysis).
- Spline modeling to determine threshold eGFR for MALEs or all-cause mortality.
- Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses to assess CKD risk group associations.
Main Results:
- Patients in Group C (stage 5 CKD/dialysis) had double the risk of amputation and MALE, and triple the risk of all-cause mortality compared to Group A.
- In dialysis-dependent patients, endovascular therapy showed better survival but a doubled reintervention risk versus surgical revascularization.
- Spline analysis revealed a sharp increase in MALE/mortality hazard at eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m².
Conclusions:
- Progressive renal impairment in CLTI patients compromises survival and limb salvage, potentially diminishing the benefits of open vs. endovascular revascularization.
- For dialysis-dependent CLTI patients, endovascular therapy offers survival advantages but necessitates closer monitoring for reintervention.
Background:
Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) has a high risk of poor outcomes. We aimed to compare the outcomes of lower extremity revascularization in patients with CLTI stratified by CKD severity in patients enrolled in the prospective, randomized Best Endovascular vs Best Surgical Therapy in Patients with CLTI (BEST-CLI) trial.
Methods:
The BEST-CLI trial dataset was queried to categorize patients into three groups according to CKD stage. Group A includes non-CKD and CKD stages <3; group B includes stage 3 and stage 4 CKD patients; and group C includes stage 5 CKD and dialysis-dependent patients. Furthermore, spline modeling was performed across the range of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2) observed in study participants to identify a threshold eGFR that impacted the primary trial outcomes: major adverse limb events (MALEs; defined as above-ankle amputation or major reintervention) or all-cause mortality, by surgical or endovascular revascularization (as-treated analysis). Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to assess association of CKD risk groups with the outcomes.
Results:
A total of 1797 patients were included. Group C patients had double the risk of amputation (hazard ratio [HR], 2.13; P < .001), MALE, or all-cause mortality (HR, 2.05; P < .001) and more than triple the risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 3.40; P < .001) compared with group A. In dialysis-dependent patients, endovascular therapy was associated with better survival, but twice the risk of reintervention compared with surgical revascularization. According to spline model analysis, hazard of MALE or all-cause mortality increased sharply at eGFR <30. The hazard ratios for eGFR <30 vs ≥60 were 2.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.68-2.43; P < .001) and 3.46 (95% CI, 2.80-4.27; P < .001) for MALE and mortality, respectively. At eGFR <30, there was no difference in the primary outcome by treatment received (surgical or endovascular revascularization).
Conclusions:
The progressive nature of renal impairment in patients with CLTI threatens their survival and limb salvage and may reduce the relative benefit of open vs endovascular revascularization seen in the overall BEST-CLI trial population. In dialysis-dependent patients, endovascular therapy was associated with lower mortality but increased reintervention rate.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury I: Introduction
Acute Kidney Injury II: Pathophysiology
Acute Kidney Injury III: Clinical Manifestations
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care

