Microvascular reconstruction in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a Europe-wide data collection

This study aims to analyze microvascular reconstruction in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) in Europe.

Based on previous studies, a dynamic online questionnaire was developed and subjected to internal and external evaluation. The questionnaire comprised multiple-choice, rating, and open-ended questions, addressing general and specific aspects and the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on microvascular reconstruction in OMFS in Europe. It was implemented into SurveyMonkey's^® online survey software and emailed to OMFS departments registered with the European Association for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery (EACMFS).

Seventy-five participants from 23 European countries participated. Among them, 89% perform between 1 and 70 microvascular free flaps (MFF) annually. 38% of the participants reported a reduction in MFF due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The radial forearm (41% of participants) and fibula free flap (31%) are the most reported MFF. In most cases (59%), MFF procedures are exclusively performed by OMFS for OMFS patients, while 43% of participants reported cooperations with plastic surgeons to perform MFF for OMFS patients. Many participants prefer arterial end-to-end anastomoses (54%) using the facial artery (54%) and, if available, two venous anastomoses (68%). Low molecular weight heparin is the most used postoperative anticoagulant, reported by 67% of participants. For flap monitoring, clinical assessment and Doppler ultrasound are preferred by most participants (95% and 78%, respectively). Many participants (66%) indicated that tracheotomy is only performed when necessary. Differences were observed in relation to CAD/CAM (Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing) techniques, types of osteosynthesis, and dental implant treatment.

This study highlighted variability in microvascular reconstruction in OMFS in Europe. Further studies are needed to assess these aspects in detail.