Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2026
08:44
The Utility of Stage-specific Mid-to-late Drosophila Follicle Isolation
Published on: December 2, 2013
11.2K
Comparison of One-Drill Protocol to Sequential Drilling In Vitro and In Vivo.
Sihana Rugova1, Marcus Abboud2
1Department of Oral Biology and Pathology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)
|January 24, 2025
Summary
Shorter bone drilling protocols generate less heat and may improve early osseointegration compared to sequential methods. Optimized drilling reduces thermal stress, potentially enhancing bone-to-implant contact.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Biomaterials Science
- Surgical Techniques
Background:
- Bone drilling generates heat, potentially impacting osseointegration.
- Different drilling protocols and implant systems may influence thermal load and healing.
- Optimizing surgical techniques is crucial for successful dental implant outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare heat generation during bone drilling using a novel one-drill protocol versus a sequential protocol.
- To evaluate the effect of these drilling protocols on early osseointegration in an animal model.
- To determine if reduced drilling time and thermal stress enhance bone-to-implant contact (BIC).
Main Methods:
- In vitro thermal analysis using infrared thermography during bone drilling.
- In vivo study in an animal model using different implant systems (Straumann BLT SLActive, Medentika Quattrocone).
- Histological analysis of bone-to-implant contact (BIC) at three weeks post-surgery.
Main Results:
- The sequential drilling protocol generated significantly more heat than the one-drill protocol in vitro.
- The animal model showed a trend favoring shorter drilling protocols for osseointegration.
- No statistically significant differences in BIC were observed between protocols, despite reduced drilling times with the one-drill method.
Conclusions:
- Minimizing drilling steps and thermal stress may be more critical for early osseointegration than implant surface treatments.
- Optimized drilling protocols that reduce heat generation can potentially preserve bone structure and enhance healing.
- Further research is warranted to fully elucidate the relationship between drilling parameters and long-term implant success.
Keywords:
BLTSLActivebone-to-implant contactdental implantdrilling protocolsheat generationimplant bed preparationimplant drillsosseointegrationosteotomystraumannsurgical drill bitsthermal traumaMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:16Methods for Studying Drug Absorption: In vitro
In vitro experiments are crucial for understanding the transport and absorption of drugs through biological materials. These studies employ varied methods such as the diffusion cell method, the everted sac technique, and the everted ring technique.
The diffusion cell method uses a two-compartment cell, including a donor compartment with the drug solution, which simulates the environment where the drug is applied, and a receptor compartment with a buffer solution, which simulates the environment...
The diffusion cell method uses a two-compartment cell, including a donor compartment with the drug solution, which simulates the environment where the drug is applied, and a receptor compartment with a buffer solution, which simulates the environment...
01:10In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation
In vitro dissolution and drug release tests assess how quickly and how much of a drug is released from its dosage form into an aqueous medium under standardized laboratory conditions. These tests are essential tools in pharmaceutical development and quality assurance, offering insight into the drug's performance before clinical use.During formulation development, dissolution testing identifies incomplete or inconsistent drug release issues. It also supports decisions on selecting the optimal...
01:13In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Compendial Testing Models I
Compendial dissolution methods are standardized procedures defined by pharmacopeias to evaluate the rate at which a drug dissolves in a specific medium. These methods ensure batch-to-batch consistency, enable quality control, and support the prediction of drug bioavailability. They are critical for both immediate and modified-release drug products.The apparatuses used for dissolution testing differ in their design and mechanical function, but all aim to simulate the physiological environment of...
01:09In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Compendial Testing Models II
Various dissolution methods are utilized to assess a drug’s dissolution rate, including the flow-through cell, paddle-over-disk, cylinder, and reciprocating disk methods.The flow-through cell apparatus (USP (United States Pharmacopeia) method 4) comprises a reservoir for the dissolution medium and a pump that propels the medium through the cell containing the test sample. This method is crucial for assessing modified-release dosage forms with minimally soluble active ingredients, maintaining...
01:17In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Alternative Methods
Alternative drug dissolution methods include the rotating bottle, intrinsic dissolution test, peristalsis, and the Franz diffusion cell method. The rotating bottle method involves meticulously rotating tightly capped controlled-release beads in a temperature-controlled bath. Periodic decanting of samples allows for residue assay, followed by refilling with fresh medium and testing at various pH levels to emulate the gastrointestinal tract conditions.In contrast, the intrinsic dissolution test...