Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory

Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory

Cognitive psychologist Richard Lazarus proposed the cognitive-mediational theory of emotions, which emphasizes how individuals' assessments of stressors significantly affect their experience of stress. According to Lazarus, the stress response is determined by a two-step appraisal process: primary appraisal and secondary appraisal. These cognitive appraisals help individuals evaluate the potential impact of a stressor and determine the adequacy of their coping resources.
Primary Appraisal:...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Executive resources shape the impact of language predictability across the adult lifespan.

eLife·2026

Same author

The impact of premature birth and low birth weight on motor, visual, and cognitive skills and mental health in adolescence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

European child & adolescent psychiatry·2026

Same author

Developing a Screening Tool for Psychological Stress in Musicians: The Lübeck Inventory on Musicians' Psychological Stress (LIMIT).

Medical problems of performing artists·2025

Same author

Neural alpha oscillations and auditory steady-state responses during adaptation to a cochlear implant.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2025

Same author

Characterizing Directional Dynamics of Semantic Prediction Based on Inter-regional Temporal Generalization.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025

Same author

The Inattentional Rhythm in Audition.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025

Same journal

Training in the Categorization of Aerial and Terrestrial Scenes Differentially Impacts Scene-Selective and Nonscene-Selective Regions in Occipitotemporal Cortex.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Superficial Ventral Premotor Pathways to Primary Motor Cortex Shape the Temporal Coordination of Precision Grasping.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Quantifying the Influence of Lexical Surprisal on Acoustic Speech Encoding While Controlling for Within-Speaker Variability.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Profiles of Women in Science: Seung-Hee Lee, Associate Professor at the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology and Associate Director of the Institute for Basic Science, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Impact of Voluntary Alcohol Consumption on Corticostriatal Plasticity in Rats.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026

Same journal

The Brain Response to Reflectional Symmetry Is Not Uniquely Preattentive.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2025

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

Predicting the Irrelevant: Neural Effects of Distractor Predictability Depend on Load.

Troby Ka-Yan Lui^1,2, Jonas Obleser^1,2, Malte Wöstmann^1,2

¹Department of Psychology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

The European Journal of Neuroscience

|January 24, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Predictable distractors can reduce uncertainty by aiding the brain's predictive model, but this benefit depends on cognitive resources. Unpredictable distractors demand more cognitive resources and may misdirect attention.

Keywords:

attention auditory distraction load memory prediction

More Related Videos

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2025

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Area of Science:

Cognitive Neuroscience
Auditory Perception
Predictive Coding

Background:

Distraction is common, and predictable distractors may offer processing advantages.
Understanding how humans exploit distractor predictability is crucial for cognitive models.
The role of cognitive resources in utilizing predictable distractors remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate if predictable distractors reduce uncertainty in internal predictive model updating.
To examine the neural and behavioral effects of predictable versus unpredictable distractors.
To determine the influence of perceptual and cognitive load on distractor predictability utilization.

Main Methods:

An auditory spatial n-back task with predictable and unpredictable auditory distractors.
Electroencephalography (EEG) to record neural responses.
Behavioral analysis of response strategies under varying task demands.

Main Results:

Predictable distractors decreased uncertainty and reduced the need for predictive model updating.
Neural responses (alpha oscillations, P2, frontal negativity) differed for predictable vs. unpredictable distractors.
Distractor predictability benefits were resource-dependent, particularly under low cognitive load.

Conclusions:

Predictable distractors can be exploited to decrease uncertainty, aiding predictive processing.
Unpredictable distractors elicit stronger neural responses and increase cognitive load.
The utilization of predictable distractors is not fully automatic and depends on available cognitive resources.