Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2025

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
Published on: March 17, 2019
Duration of Time Intervals for Risk Minimization Measure Effectiveness Studies
Sharon C M Essink1,2, Inge M Zomerdijk2, Thomas Goedecke3
1Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Evaluating risk minimization measures (RMMs) effectiveness in post-authorization safety studies (PASSs) takes over four years. The longest delays occur between study request and initiation, highlighting a need for improved guidance and timely protocol submissions.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacovigilance and Drug Safety
- Regulatory Science
- Pharmaceutical Policy
Background:
- Regulatory oversight of medicines requires robust evaluation of risk minimization measures (RMMs) effectiveness.
- Post-authorization safety studies (PASSs) are crucial for assessing RMMs in real-world settings.
- Understanding the timelines for RMM effectiveness studies can identify bottlenecks in the regulatory process.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the time intervals between key regulatory milestones for RMM effectiveness studies.
- To identify the most time-consuming phases in the evaluation of RMM effectiveness PASSs.
- To provide insights for optimizing the RMM effectiveness assessment process.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of completed RMM effectiveness PASSs assessed by the European Medicines Agency's Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) between 2016 and 2022.
- Extraction of regulatory document dates from EMA databases.
- Calculation of time durations between study request, protocol assessment, study start, and final study report assessment.
Main Results:
- The median duration from study request to final PRAC outcome for RMM effectiveness PASSs was 52 months (over 4 years).
- The period from study request to study start averaged 21 months, representing a significant time lag.
- Protocol assessment for studies with approved protocols took a median of 7 months.
Conclusions:
- The overall timeline for evaluating RMM effectiveness PASSs significantly exceeds four years.
- The pre-study phase (request to study start) is a major contributor to the extended duration.
- Improving guidance and encouraging timely protocol submissions could expedite the evaluation of RMM effectiveness.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Hazard Rate
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...

