Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2025

Lung CT Segmentation to Identify Consolidations and Ground Glass Areas for Quantitative Assesment of SARS-CoV Pneumonia
Published on: December 19, 2020
Diagnosis of Peritonsillar Abscess-A Prospective Study Comparing Clinical with CT Findings in 133 Consecutive
François Voruz1, Rebecca Revol1, Christophe Combescure2
1Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Clinic of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract:
Background: Peritonsillar abscess (PTA) is relatively common but challenging to diagnose clinically. Several clinical signs may be used, with unknown performances. We evaluated and compared the diagnostic performance of individual and combined clinical signs (trismus, edema, pharynx immobility, uvula deviation, hot potato voice, and overall clinical impression) assessed by an otolaryngologist and of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) to detect acute PTA. Methods: Prospective study in 133 consecutive adult patients (77 males, mean age = 33 years) with suspected clinical PTA and CT obtained in the emergency setting of a tertiary care hospital between November 2020 and October 2022. The standard of reference consisted of surgically proven pus within 24 h of CT or a favorable clinical evolution at 48 h without surgical intervention. Results: PTA was present in 117/133 (88%) patients, with no difference between mean age or sex distribution between the groups with and without PTA. None of the evaluated clinical signs were associated with PTA (OR = 1.26-5.43, p > 0.05), whereas the CT finding "abscess" was significantly associated with PTA (OR = 67.2, p < 0.0001). The sensitivity of individual clinical signs varied between 19.7% and 73.5%, and the sensitivity of CT was significantly higher for all clinical signs (95.7%, p < 0.0001) except for overall clinical impression (97.4%, p = 0.7266). The specificity of clinical signs varied between 12.5% and 93.8%, and the specificity of CT was significantly higher (75%, p < 0.05) for overall clinical impression and edema. All clinical signs together yielded an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.677. Conclusions: In adults, clinical assessment alone using independent clinical signs and overall clinical impression does not allow a reliable diagnosis of PTA, even when performed by an otolaryngologist. CT is reliable in diagnosing PTA and, whenever available, should be the examination method of choice for diagnosing PTA, especially by a non-specialist.
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Tonsillitis I: Introduction
Etiology
Three primary contributing factors have been identified.
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
Acute Pancreatitis II: Clinical Manifestations and Management

