Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2025

Heterogeneity Mapping of Protein Expression in Tumors using Quantitative Immunofluorescence
Published on: October 25, 2011
Analysis of Differences in the Classification of Endometrial Cancer Patients in Poland
Wiktor Szatkowski1, Tomasz Kluz2, Małgorzata Cieślak-Steć3
1Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Krakow Branch, 31-115 Kraków, Poland.
Abstract:
Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) incidence and mortality have been steadily rising globally over recent decades. The introduction of advanced molecular technologies, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) alongside the FIGO 2023 classification, presents opportunities for refined diagnostics and risk stratification. This study aimed to analyze differences in EC classification among oncology centers in southeastern Poland. Methods: Data were collected from 461 consecutive patients newly diagnosed with EC between 2022 and 2024 at four major oncology centers in southeastern Poland. Molecular and immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses were conducted on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues to identify key markers, including POLE mutations, MSI-H, and p53 status. Results: The application of the FIGO 2023 staging system revealed statistically significant inter-center differences, with Centers 1 and 4 diagnosing a higher proportion of early-stage cases. The most prevalent subtype was NSMP, observed in 51% of cases. MSI-H occurred in 13-36% of patients, depending on the center. p53 mutations ranged from 9% to 26%. POLE mutations were identified in 4% of patients overall. Significant variations in the molecular subtype distribution across centers highlight potential differences in diagnostic access or tumor biology. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate regional differences in EC staging and molecular profiles in Poland, potentially reflecting disparities in diagnostic resources, methodologies, or tumor characteristics. Addressing these variations through standardized diagnostic protocols and equitable access to molecular tools is critical for optimizing patient outcomes. Future research should focus on evaluating the impact of molecular markers on therapy response and prognosis to guide personalized treatment strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

