Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diagnostic probability change across follow-up: a Bayesian EHR cohort study in psychiatry.

Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany)·2026
Same author

A Practical Gut-On-Chip Workflow for Imaging-Based Assessment of Epithelial Barrier Dynamics During E. coli Co-Culture.

Biotechnology and bioengineering·2026
Same author

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Improves Subchondral Perfusion and Cartilage Integrity in Established Osteoarthritis: A Pharmacokinetic DCE-MRI and T2* Quantification Study.

Cartilage·2026
Same author

Gaussian boson sampling with 1,024 squeezed states in 8,176 modes.

Nature·2026
Same author

A retrospective analysis of the effects of COVID-19 on cancer diagnosis and staging in Taiwan.

Journal of infection in developing countries·2026
Same author

Taming Rydberg Decay with Measurement-Based Quantum Computation.

Physical review letters·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
12:45

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer

Published on: February 12, 2022

5.5K

Robotic-Assisted Colon Cancer Surgery: Faster Recovery and Less Pain Compared to Laparoscopy in a Retrospective

Chun-Yu Lin1,2,3,4, Yi-Chun Liu1,5,6, Chou-Chen Chen2,6

  • 1Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112211, Taiwan.

Cancers
|January 25, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) offers faster recovery and reduced postoperative pain for colon cancer resection compared to laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LSS). RAS also showed lower ileus rates in left colectomies and higher lymph node yields in right colectomies.

Keywords:
colon cancercolorectal cancerlaparoscopyminimally invasive surgeryrobotic surgery

More Related Videos

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst
11:03

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst

Published on: June 24, 2022

5.5K
Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

323

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
12:45

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer

Published on: February 12, 2022

5.5K
Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst
11:03

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst

Published on: June 24, 2022

5.5K
Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

323

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Oncology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading global malignancy, with colon cancer comprising a significant portion.
  • Surgery, particularly colectomy, is the primary treatment for colon cancer.
  • Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is an emerging technique for colon cancer resection, necessitating comparative studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LSS) for stage I-III colon cancer resection.
  • To evaluate recovery milestones, complications, and postoperative pain between RAS and LSS.
  • To assess differences in ileus rates and lymph node yield between the two surgical approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study comparing RAS and LSS for right and left colectomies.
  • Propensity score matching based on age, gender, ASA score, and BMI.
  • Comparison of perioperative outcomes including recovery, complications, and pain scores.

Main Results:

  • RAS demonstrated significantly faster recovery, evidenced by shorter hospital stays for both right colectomy (RC) and left colectomy (LC).
  • RAS was associated with lower rates of postoperative ileus in LC and higher lymph node yields in RC.
  • No significant difference in major complication rates was observed between RAS and LSS, though RAS patients reported significantly lower postoperative pain.

Conclusions:

  • Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) facilitates quicker recovery and reduced postoperative pain compared to laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LSS) for colon cancer resection.
  • RAS offers specific advantages such as lower ileus rates in left colectomies and improved lymph node retrieval in right colectomies.
  • RAS represents a viable and potentially superior surgical option for colon cancer treatment.