Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Factors associated with poor predictability by intraocular lens calculation formulas.

S C Richards, R J Olson, W L Richards

    Archives of Ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)
    |April 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary

    Intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas accurately predict refractive outcomes in some patients. Poor prediction was associated with greater astigmatism and shorter axial length, but not with preoperative astigmatism changes.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Bioenergetics, Trophic Ecology, and Niche Separation of Tunas.

    Advances in marine biology·2016
    Same author

    D-Penicillamine administration and the incidence of retinopathy of prematurity.

    Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2007
    Same author

    A pilot trial testing the feasibility of administering D-penicillamine to extremely low birth weight neonates.

    Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2006
    Same author

    Ultradian Growth in Prochlorococcus spp.

    Applied and environmental microbiology·2005
    Same author

    Direct evidence for Mendelian inheritance of the variations in the ribosomal protein gene introns in yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares).

    Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.)·2004
    Same author

    Glistenings with long-term follow-up of the Surgidev B20/20 polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lens.

    American journal of ophthalmology·2001

    Area of Science:

    • Ophthalmology
    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Optics

    Background:

    • Accurate prediction of postoperative refraction is crucial for successful intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.
    • Existing IOL calculation formulas vary in their predictive accuracy, impacting patient outcomes.
    • Understanding factors influencing prediction accuracy is essential for improving surgical planning.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare patient groups based on the accuracy of IOL calculation formulas for posterior chamber IOL implantation.
    • To identify clinical and biometric factors associated with accurate versus inaccurate postoperative refraction prediction.

    Main Methods:

    • Retrospective comparison of two groups: accurately predicted vs. poorly predicted postoperative refraction.
    • Analysis of preoperative and postoperative refractive data, including astigmatism.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of biometric parameters: axial length, anterior chamber depth, and patient demographics.

    • Main Results:

    • The poorly predicted group exhibited greater postoperative astigmatism but similar preoperative to postoperative astigmatism changes.
    • Shorter average axial length and a higher proportion of females were observed in the poorly predicted group.
    • Increased measurement variability was noted in the poorly predicted group; no significant differences in age, IOL type, or complications were found.

    Conclusions:

    • IOL calculation formula accuracy can vary significantly, even within the same patient cohort.
    • Axial length and patient sex may be associated with prediction inaccuracies, warranting further investigation.
    • While postoperative astigmatism was higher in poorly predicted cases, the change from baseline was similar, suggesting formula-specific predictive limitations.