Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Transaxillary First Rib Resection for Treatment of the Thoracic Outlet Syndrome
Published on: September 13, 2020
Regional Anesthesia with Spontaneous Breathing for Trans-Axillary Surgery in Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A
Francesco Stilo1,2, Alessandro Strumia3, Vincenzo Catanese1
1Vascular Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200-00128 Roma, Italy.
Abstract:
Background: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is an uncommon condition defined by the compression of neurovascular structures within the thoracic outlet. When conservative management strategies fail to alleviate symptoms, surgical decompression becomes necessary. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of regional anesthesia (RA) using spontaneous breathing in contrast to general anesthesia (GA) for patients undergoing surgical intervention for TOS. Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparative study involving 68 patients who underwent trans-axillary first rib resection for TOS. The patient cohort was divided into two groups: 29 patients in the GA group and 39 patients in the RA group. The RA technique employed consisted of supraclavicular brachial plexus (SBP) and pectoral nerve (PECS II) blocks, accompanied by deep sedation. Key outcome measures such as pain scores, opioid consumption, and various perioperative parameters were systematically analyzed. Results: Postoperative pain levels recorded in the recovery room were significantly lower in the RA group, with a median numerical rating scale (NRS) score of zero compared to two in the GA group (p = 0.0443). Additionally, both intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption showed a marked reduction in the RA group, with p-values of less than 0.001 and 0.0418, respectively. The RA approach was associated with shorter surgical durations (p = 0.0008), a decrease in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (p = 0.0312), and a lower occurrence of intraoperative lung injuries (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the length of hospital stay was significantly reduced for patients in the RA group. Conclusions: Although both groups reported low postoperative pain scores, the regional anesthesia approach exhibited distinct advantages in terms of opioid consumption, surgical duration, and overall perioperative outcomes. The utilization of SBP and PECS II blocks facilitated surgical procedures and mitigated complications, thereby positively influencing the postoperative recovery trajectory. Future prospective studies are essential to validate these findings further and to investigate long-term outcomes associated with the use of regional anesthesia in TOS surgery.
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Pneumothorax-II
Clinical Manifestations:

