Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

05:00
Intense Pulsed Light for the Treatment of Dry Eye Owing to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
Published on: April 1, 2019
14.9K
Diagnostic Cut-Off Values Based on Lipid Layer Pattern for Dry Eye Disease Subtypes Assessment
Belen Sabucedo-Villamarin1, Jacobo Garcia-Queiruga1,2, Hugo Pena-Verdeal1,2
1GI-2092-Optometry, Departamento de Física Aplicada (Área de Optometría), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Vida s/n, 15701 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
|January 25, 2025
Summary
The Lipid Layer Pattern (LLP) can help distinguish Mixed Dry Eye Disease (MDE) from other subtypes like Aqueous Deficient Dry Eye (ADDE) and Evaporative Dry Eye (EDE). This finding aids in better diagnosis and management of dry eye disease subtypes.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Ocular Surface Disease
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Dry Eye Disease (DED) encompasses various subtypes, including Aqueous Deficient Dry Eye (ADDE), Evaporative Dry Eye (EDE), and Mixed Dry Eye (MDE).
- Accurate differentiation of DED subtypes is crucial for effective treatment strategies.
- The Lipid Layer Pattern (LLP) is a potential biomarker for DED assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine cut-off values for the Lipid Layer Pattern (LLP) to differentiate between subtypes of Dry Eye Disease (DED).
- To evaluate the diagnostic potential of LLP assessed via Guillon (LLP-G) and Colour (LLP-C) schemes in distinguishing DED subtypes.
Main Methods:
- 240 participants diagnosed with DED were categorized into ADDE, EDE, or MDE groups based on Tear Meniscus Height (TMH) and Meibomian Gland Loss Area (MGLA).
- Lipid Layer Pattern (LLP) was assessed using the Tearscope under both LLP-G and LLP-C schemes.
- Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis was employed to determine diagnostic potential and cut-off values.
Main Results:
- LLP-G and LLP-C showed no significant diagnostic value in differentiating ADDE from EDE.
- LLP-G and LLP-C demonstrated diagnostic potential in distinguishing ADDE from MDE, with specific cut-off values and AUCs.
- LLP-G and LLP-C also showed significant potential in differentiating EDE from MDE, with identified cut-off values and AUCs.
Conclusions:
- The Lipid Layer Pattern (LLP), when assessed using the Tearscope, possesses diagnostic potential.
- LLP effectively distinguishes Mixed Dry Eye Disease (MDE) participants from those with Aqueous Deficient Dry Eye (ADDE) and Evaporative Dry Eye (EDE).
- These findings support the use of LLP assessment for subtype differentiation in DED management.

