Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2025
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multiplex Detection of Respiratory Viruses
Published on: November 10, 2023
Comparison of Two Field Deployable PCR Platforms for SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A and B Viruses' Detection
Hakim Bouamar1, Grace M Reed1, Wanda Lyon2
1Center for Advanced Molecular Detection, 59th Medical Wing/Science & Technology, Joint Base San Antonio, Lackland, TX 78236, USA.
Background:
Respiratory viral infections are a major public health challenge and the most diagnosed medical condition, particularly for individuals living in close proximity, like military personnel. We compared the sensitivity and specificity of the Biomeme FranklinTM and Truelab® RT-PCR thermocyclers to determine which platform is more sensitive and specific at detecting SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A and B viruses.
Methodology:
RNA extracted from nasopharyngeal swabs of infected and uninfected individuals was tested on the Biomeme FranklinTM at Lackland and the Truelab® at Wright Patterson Air Force bases.
Results:
We found an 88% and 71% positivity rate in SARS-CoV-2-infected samples tested on Biomeme and Truelab®, respectively. Likewise, we found a 49% and 80% positivity rate in influenza-positive samples tested on Biomeme and Truelab®, respectively. One hundred percent of uninfected swab samples tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 on both platforms. Conversely, 91% and 100% of uninfected swabs tested negative for flu on Biomeme and Truelab®, respectively.
Significance:
Differences in specificity and sensitivity in detection of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza between Biomeme and Truelab® suggest that Truelab® is a more promising and potentially deployable diagnostic platform for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses' detection in an austere environment.
