Urinary Fluoride Levels Among Youth in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2015-2016:...

Urinary fluoride (UF) is the most well-established biomarker for fluoride exposure, and understanding its distribution can inform risk assessment for potential adverse systemic health effects. To our knowledge, this study is the first to report distributions of UF among youth according to sociodemographic factors in a nationally representative United States (US) sample.

The study included 1191 children aged 6-11 years and 1217 adolescents aged 12-19 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2015-2016. We examined UF according to sociodemographic variables as well as Spearman correlations between UF and plasma fluoride. Survey-weighted quantile regression examined associations between tap water fluoride and UF levels adjusted for covariates.

The average age of participants was 12.5 years. The median (IQR) UF and water fluoride concentrations were 0.52 (0.50) mg/L and 0.39 (0.54) mg/L, respectively. Children had higher UF levels than adolescents and males had higher UF levels than females. UF differed according to race/ethnicity among both children and adolescents. Specifically, non-Hispanic Black youth tended to have higher UF levels than all participants except for those classified as other race/multiracial. UF and plasma fluoride were moderately correlated for children and adolescents. Higher water fluoride levels were associated with higher UF levels, and the magnitudes of association were larger at higher quantiles of UF (β = 0.14, p < 0.001; β = 0.20, p< 0.001 at the 25th and 50th quantiles, respectively). The magnitude of association between water fluoride and UF was the largest for non-Hispanic Black participants (predictive margin = 0.3, p < 0.001).

Non-Hispanic Black youth in the US may have greater fluoride exposure and receive more of their fluoride intake from tap water than youth of other races/ethnicities. Factors contributing to potential racial/ethnic disparities in fluoride exposure within the US warrant further investigation so that they can be mitigated to reduce the potential for harm.