Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

134
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
134
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

2.7K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
2.7K
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

86
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
86
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

11.1K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
11.1K
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

11.8K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
11.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Statistical models for Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: Lessons learned from the DIAN-TU Platform Trial.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2026
Same author

Penalized estimation of linear transformation models for interval-censored data with time-dependent covariates.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

Likelihood ratio test for the disease progression model to measure saved time in Alzheimer's disease.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

Adaptive sample size re-estimation designs for a two-stage randomized trial with binary outcome.

Statistical methods in medical research·2025
Same author

Response to Letter to the Editor "Comments on 'Novel Non-Linear Models for Clinical Trial Analysis With Longitudinal Data: A Tutorial Using SAS for Both Frequentist and Bayesian Methods'".

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

On-site health service delivery models at syringe services programs in the United States: Results of a national cross-sectional survey.

Drug and alcohol dependence reports·2025
Same journal

A statistical evaluation of decision-making methods and the efficiency of Bayesian multi-arm multi-stage trials.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Accounting for non-adherence: A re-analysis of the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results trial.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Phase I design for partially ordered groups with late-onset toxicity.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Trial informed consent forms, the Declaration of Helsinki and the SPIRIT 2025 statement.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

17th Annual University of Pennsylvania Conference on statistical issues in clinical trials - Covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials: New methods and applications (Morning panel discussion).

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

17th Annual University of Pennsylvania Conference on statistical issues in clinical trials - Covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials: New methods and applications (Afternoon panel discussion).

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K

Adaptive promising zone design for sequential parallel comparison design with continuous outcomes.

Xinlin Lu1, Guogen Shan1

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Clinical Trials (London, England)
|January 25, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Adaptive strategies like sample size adjustment improve clinical trial efficiency. The Promising Zone method offers better power and smaller sample sizes, though maximum sample size may increase. Allocation ratio adjustments provide limited benefits but can help in specific cases.

Keywords:
Adaptive designallocation ratio modificationexpected sample sizeplacebo effectsequential parallel comparison design

More Related Videos

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

16.4K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

626

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K
Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

16.4K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

626

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Pharmaceutical Research

Background:

  • Sequential parallel comparison designs are effective for trials with high placebo response rates.
  • Adaptive strategies, including sample size and allocation ratio adjustments, can enhance trial efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare Jennison and Turnbull's method with the Promising Zone approach for sample size adjustment.
  • To evaluate the impact of allocation ratio adjustments (Neyman and Optimal) in adaptive sequential parallel comparison designs.
  • To assess the influence of various design parameters on adaptive strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated various scenarios to evaluate sample size adjustment methods (Jennison and Turnbull vs. Promising Zone).
  • Assessed allocation ratio adjustments using Neyman and Optimal strategies.
  • Investigated effects of weight in test statistic, initial randomization ratio, and interim analysis timing.

Main Results:

  • The Promising Zone approach showed superior or comparable power to Jennison and Turnbull's method at similar expected sample sizes.
  • The Promising Zone method intuitively reduces sample size with promising interim results but may increase maximum sample size.
  • Allocation ratio adjustments provided minor overall benefits, but showed potential when treatment group variance exceeded placebo group variance.
  • Findings were applied to the AVP-923 trial for Alzheimer's disease-related agitation.

Conclusions:

  • Adaptive strategies significantly improve the efficiency of sequential parallel comparison designs.
  • Method selection for sample size adjustment requires balancing power, expected, and maximum sample sizes.
  • Allocation ratio adjustments have limited impact but may be useful in specific scenarios.
  • Future research should focus on adaptive strategies for binary and survival outcomes.