Usefulness of urinary biomarker-based risk score and multiparametric MRI for clinically significant prostate cancer detection in biopsy-naïve patients
- 1Department of Radiology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Mickeviciaus str. 9, Kaunas, 44307, Lithuania. jurate.kemesiene@lsmu.lt.
- 2Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, 08036, Spain.
- 3Departmet of Urology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Mickeviciaus str. 9, Kaunas, 44307, Lithuania.
- 4Department of Radiology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Mickeviciaus str. 9, Kaunas, 44307, Lithuania.
- 5JSC Diagnolita, Sauletekio aleja 7c, Vilnius, 10257, Lithuania.
- 0Department of Radiology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Mickeviciaus str. 9, Kaunas, 44307, Lithuania. jurate.kemesiene@lsmu.lt.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Combining genetic urinary tests (GUT) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) significantly improves clinically significant prostate cancer detection. This approach reduces unnecessary biopsies more effectively than other methods.
Area Of Science
- Urology
- Radiology
- Oncology
Background
- Accurate diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) is crucial for biopsy-naïve patients.
- Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and genetic urinary tests (GUT) are emerging diagnostic tools.
- Risk calculators like PCPTRC2 aid in risk stratification.
Purpose Of The Study
- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI, GUT, and PCPTRC2 for csPCa in biopsy-naïve men.
- To compare the effectiveness of these modalities, individually and in combination, in identifying csPCa.
- To assess the potential of these methods to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.
Main Methods
- Prospective study of 208 biopsy-naïve men (2021-2024).
- Procedures included mpMRI, GUT (analyzing PCA3, TMPRSS2-ERG fusion genes, age, PSA density), and ultrasound-guided biopsy.
- Prostate cancer prevention trial risk calculator version 2.0 (PCPTRC2) was used for risk assessment.
Main Results
- The combination of GUT and mpMRI demonstrated superior sensitivity (99.1%) compared to individual methods (GUT 84.4%, mpMRI 93.8%).
- mpMRI combined with PCPTRC2 also showed high sensitivity (99.0%).
- The mpMRI plus GUT combination allowed for a greater reduction in unnecessary biopsies (25%) compared to mpMRI plus PCPTRC2 (2.4%).
Conclusions
- Combining GUT and mpMRI offers a highly sensitive approach for diagnosing csPCa.
- This combination significantly reduces the rate of unnecessary biopsies with a minimal risk of missing csPCa.
- GUT and mpMRI represent a valuable strategy for optimizing prostate cancer diagnosis and management.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

