Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Skeletal Muscle Gender Dimorphism from Proteomics
Published on: December 14, 2011
Cross-Sectional Study Gender Pay Gap in Industry General Payments to U.S. General and Fellowship-Trained Surgeons
Heng Jiang1, Lina M Adwer2, Taoyuan Beninato3
1Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska; Department of Medicine, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla.
Introduction:
Gender disparities exist in nonresearch industry payments to U.S. physicians, but detailed analyses specific to surgeons are limited. This study aims to investigate the gender pay gap in industry general nonresearch payments made to U.S. general and fellowship-trained surgeons between 2016 and 2022.
Methods:
Data on industry payments to U.S. surgeons were collected from the open payments database. General and fellowship-trained surgeons were included. Gender prediction was conducted using an artificial intelligence tool. Payment type, amount, and company were summarized. Gender differences were compared.
Results:
Between 2016 and 2022, the medical and device industry made 1,998,110 payments totaling $739,264,940 to U.S. general and fellowship-trained surgeons. The median payment was $31, primarily for food and beverages. Surgeons receiving over $5000 annually accounted for $634,530,579 (86%). Most payments were device-related (92%). Intuitive ($199M), Medtronic ($57M), and Boston Scientific ($46M) were the top-paying companies. California received the highest payments ($90M). Payments peaked in 2019 before falling due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Men were paid significantly more than women, with an average $16,509 annual pay gap favoring men (P < 0.001). In 2019, the industry paid men $44,025 on average, compared to $16,677 for women.
Conclusions:
Among U.S. general and fellowship-trained surgeons, there is a gender pay gap in industry general payments, where males receive higher compensation for nonresearch-related reasons. Understanding the factors contributing to this disparity, such as differential access to industry opportunities and potential biases in compensation negotiations, is crucial for promoting equity in industry relationships.
More Related Videos
03:35Determining Gender-Based Differences in Retinal and Choroidal Thickness in Underweight Individuals via Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: December 1, 2023
05:04Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024