Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2025

Author Spotlight: Developing a Point-of-Care Hemoglobin Estimation Method for Anemia Management
Published on: January 19, 2024
Prioritizing implementation solutions for the urban family physician policy in Iran: a multi-criteria decision-making
Lida Shams1, Mohammadreza Mobinizadeh2, Taha Nasiri3,4
1Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Background:
Family physician program is one of the effective reforms of the health system in Iran, but despite the implementation of this program in rural areas and the passage of ten years since its implementation in two provinces of Fars and Mazandaran, its implementation has faced problems. The aim of this study is to identify and prioritize implementation solutions related to the challenges of the family physician program in Iran.
Methods:
This is a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 22 snowball-sampled experts and managers of basic health insurers to extract problems and executive solutions through coding and data analysis using Atlas Ti software and content analysis in the first stage. The combined criteria were used to report qualitative studies (COREQ). In the second stage, the extracted executive solutions were ranked using multi-criteria decision-making (MADM) and a hybrid approach combining Shannon entropy with simple aggregation weighting (SAW).
Results:
Main themes were identified, including financing, management, human resources, structure, culture building, payment mechanism information systems, monitoring & control, performance of insurance organisations, and implementation. Out of these, priority was given to the information system, along with 41 sub-themes prioritising comprehensive, community-oriented physician training.
Conclusion:
The findings of the study provide remedies for the problems of the Iranian Urban Family Physician Programme at the executive level and in priority order, from the standpoint of the insurance organisations. Making crucial decisions entails handling matters relating to funding, administration, personnel, architecture, ethos, remuneration, IT systems, oversight, insurance organization output, and execution.
More Related Videos
11:53Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
Published on: December 9, 2012
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Dilemmas II
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare: