Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)01:23

Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)

649
Measuring blood pressure is a fundamental skill in healthcare that aids in diagnosing and monitoring hypertension and other cardiovascular conditions. An aneroid sphygmomanometer, commonly used in clinical settings, offers a manual and precise method for blood pressure measurement. The technique for using this instrument involves specific steps that must be carefully executed to ensure accuracy. The following detailed description outlines a two-step technique for assessing blood pressure using...
649
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)01:15

Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)

554
This procedural guide systematically measures blood pressure using an oscillometric digital sphygmomanometer, emphasizing accuracy, patient safety, and comfort.
Prepare for the Procedure:
554

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Breathing Dysfunction as a Meaningful and Measurable Aspect of Health in Rett Syndrome: A Caregiver's Perspective.

Digital biomarkers·2025
Same author

Correction: Validity of accelerometry in step detection and gait speed measurement in orthogeriatric patients.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Diabetes Risk Among Breast Cancer Survivors Treated with Endocrine Therapies.

Medicine and science in sports and exercise·2025
Same author

Returning individual wearable sensor results to participants: perspectives on challenges and lessons learned.

Frontiers in digital health·2025
Same author

Analysis Method of Real-World Digital Biomarkers for Clinical Impact in Cancer Patients.

Digital biomarkers·2025
Same author

Returning Individualized Wearable Sensor Results to Older Adult Research Participants: A Pilot Study.

The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2025

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
05:51

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

Published on: February 21, 2025

361

Analytical Validation of Wrist-Worn Accelerometer-Based Step-Count Methods during Structured and Free-Living

Robert T Marcotte1,2, Shelby L Bachman2, Yaya Zhai2

  • 1Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.

Digital Biomarkers
|January 28, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Evaluating wrist-worn accelerometers for step counting reveals a trade-off between structured walking and free-living activity accuracy. Novel, context-aware methods are needed for precise step detection in real-world settings.

Keywords:
AccelerometerAnalytical validationPhysical activityStep countingWrist-worn device

More Related Videos

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers
07:24

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers

Published on: April 21, 2017

12.4K
Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
06:49

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment

Published on: December 11, 2015

8.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2025

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
05:51

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

Published on: February 21, 2025

361
A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers
07:24

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers

Published on: April 21, 2017

12.4K
Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
06:49

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment

Published on: December 11, 2015

8.9K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Wearable Technology
  • Activity Recognition

Background:

  • Wrist-worn accelerometers offer passive, continuous, and remote monitoring of stepping behavior.
  • Existing step-counting methods (peak detection, threshold crossing, frequency analysis) have unclear performance across diverse activities and speeds.
  • Evaluating open-source algorithms for wrist-worn accelerometers is crucial for accurate activity monitoring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of four open-source step-counting methods using wrist-worn accelerometry data.
  • To assess the impact of parameter modification on method performance.
  • To compare method accuracy across structured locomotion and free-living activities.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty-one participants wore wrist-worn accelerometers during laboratory-based structured locomotion and free-living activities.
  • Criterion step counts were obtained via motion capture and a secondary step-counting device.
  • Four open-source algorithms were applied to accelerometer data, with and without a locomotion classifier.

Main Results:

  • Single-parameter methods (peak detection, threshold crossing) showed lowest bias in structured locomotion.
  • Three methods overestimated steps during slow walking and underestimated during fast walking.
  • Frequency analysis method had the lowest percent error during free-living activities.
  • A locomotion classifier reduced error for two methods across both activity types.

Conclusions:

  • A trade-off exists between step-counting accuracy in structured walking versus free-living activities.
  • Current open-source methods show variable performance depending on activity type and speed.
  • Development of context-aware algorithms is recommended for improved accuracy in real-world step counting.