Dissecting the effectiveness of deep features as metric of perceptual image quality

There is an open debate on the role of artificial networks to understand the visual brain. Internal representations of images in artificial networks develop human-like properties. In particular, evaluating distortions using differences between internal features is correlated to human perception of distortion. However, the origins of this correlation are not well understood. Here, we dissect the different factors involved in the emergence of human-like behavior: function, architecture, and environment. To do so, we evaluate the aforementioned human-network correlation at different depths of 46 pre-trained model configurations that include no psycho-visual information. The results show that most of the models correlate better with human opinion than SSIM (a de-facto standard in subjective image quality). Moreover, some models are better than state-of-the-art networks specifically tuned for the application (LPIPS, DISTS). Regarding the function, supervised classification leads to nets that correlate better with humans than the explored models for self- and non-supervised tasks. However, we found that better performance in the task does not imply more human behavior. Regarding the architecture, simpler models correlate better with humans than very deep nets and generally, the highest correlation is not achieved in the last layer. Finally, regarding the environment, training with large natural datasets leads to bigger correlations than training in smaller databases with restricted content, as expected. We also found that the best classification models are not the best for predicting human distances. In the general debate about understanding human vision, our empirical findings imply that explanations have not to be focused on a single abstraction level, but all function, architecture, and environment are relevant.