Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2025

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Outcome of Recurrent Tracheoesophageal Fistula Treatment After Esophageal Atresia Repair
Marit J B van Stigt1, Julia E Hut2, Ellen M B P Reuling2
1Congenital Oesophageal and Airway Team Utrecht, Departments of Paediatric Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Introduction:
Recurrent Tracheoesophageal Fistula (rTEF) is a complication of Esophageal Atresia (EA) that can lead to severe respiratory symptoms. RTEF can be corrected via endotracheal treatment (ET) or surgical treatment (ST). The efficacy of these techniques varies in literature. This study presents the outcome of rTEF treatment after EA correction at the Wilhelmina Children's Hospital in Utrecht.
Methods:
From 2000 until 2023, patients with EA (n = 251) underwent thoracoscopic EA correction by using the native esophagus at the Wilhelmina Children's Hospital in Utrecht. All EA patients who had developed rTEF (n = 19) were evaluated. Success rates, number of treatment attempts, and complication rates of ET and ST were collected in our EA database. Data was expressed as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR).
Results:
In total, 19/251 (8 %) patients had developed an rTEF after EA correction. For 10/19 (53 %) patients, primary ET was performed, with a median number of 2 procedures per patient [range 1-3]. In 8/10 patients, ET failed, therefore, these eight patients underwent secondary ST. For 9/19 (47 %) patients, primary ST was performed, with a median number of 1 procedure per patient [range 1-3]. In all patients, primary ST was performed via thoracoscopy with a success rate (absence of recurrence after 1 procedure) of 78 % (7/9) and no conversions. The complication rate was 10 % for primary ET and 44 % for primary ST, and 75 % for secondary ST. All complications were classified as minor.
Conclusion:
Thoracoscopic correction of rTEF has a high success rate. Similar to previous studies, the Utrecht success rate of ET for rTEF treatment is poor.
Type Of Study:
Retrospective cohort study.
Level Of Evidence:
IV.
Related Concept Videos
Tracheostomy: Procedure and Tubes
Tracheostomy tubes can be made of semiflexible plastic (polyurethane or silicone), rigid plastic, or metal, and they come in...
Tracheostomy Decannulation
Description of the Procedure
Decannulation refers to the permanent removal of the tracheostomy tube, signaling the resolution of the condition that initially necessitated the tracheostomy. The process requires a well-coordinated interplay between...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Trachea
Anatomical Features:
Location: About half of the trachea is situated in the neck, anterior to the esophagus, and extends from the larynx (at the level of...
Pneumothorax-II
Clinical Manifestations:
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...

