Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Change in Grading of Stunting in Children aged 0-5 years in a Tertiary Hospital in Western India by Using WHO vs.
Anu Tresa1, Vaman Khadilkar2, Rahul Jahagirdar1
1Department of Pediatrics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Medical College and Hospital, Dhankawadi, Pune, 411043, India.
Insights
The 2019 Indian synthetic growth charts identify fewer children with short stature compared to WHO charts. Using regional charts may prevent unnecessary investigations in apparently healthy children under five.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric endocrinology
- Growth monitoring
- Public health
Background:
- Accurate growth monitoring is crucial for identifying growth disorders in children.
- Existing World Health Organization (WHO) growth charts may not accurately reflect the growth patterns of all populations.
- Regional growth charts are being developed to better represent specific demographic groups.
Purpose of the Study:
- To classify children under five into normal, short, severe short, and tall stature categories using WHO (2006) and Indian 2019 synthetic growth charts.
- To compare the proportion of stunted children identified by these two sets of growth charts.
- To evaluate the diagnostic implications of using different growth charts for short stature.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 1557 apparently healthy children aged 0-5 years was studied.
- Children's stature was categorized using z-scores on both WHO 2006 and Indian 2019 synthetic growth charts.
- Stature categories included severe short, short, normal, and tall.
Main Results:
- The 2019 Indian synthetic charts classified a higher percentage of children as normal (85.4%) compared to WHO charts (73.5%).
- The prevalence of short stature decreased from 15.03% on WHO charts to 7.77% on Indian charts.
- Severe short stature prevalence dropped from 7.51% (WHO) to 2.38% (Indian charts).
Conclusions:
- WHO growth charts may overdiagnose short stature in Indian children under five by 12.4%.
- The use of the 2019 Indian synthetic growth charts resulted in a significantly lower prevalence of short and severe short stature.
- Employing region-specific growth charts, like the Indian 2019 charts, can potentially reduce unnecessary medical investigations for children with normal growth patterns.
Objectives:
To classify under 5-y-old children into normal, short, severe short and tall categories as per WHO (2006) and Indian 2019 synthetic growth charts and to compare the change in the proportion of stunted children based on these two charts.
Methods:
This study was done on 1557 (795 boys) apparently healthy children of age group 0-5 y who attended outpatient clinics for routine vaccination and their stature categories were compared on WHO 2006 vs. 2019 Indian synthetic charts. Children were categorized into severe short, short, normal and tall on both charts by calculating z scores.
Results:
On WHO charts 73.5% children were classified as normal vs. 85.4% on 2019 Indian synthetic charts. The mean Z score for height for age as per WHO was -0.85 (+/-1.62), whereas as for 2019 synthetic charts was -0.37 (+/-1.38). While using WHO growth charts the prevalence of short stature was 15.03%, and severe short stature was 7.51%, which dropped to 7.77% for short stature and 2.38% for severe short stature on 2019 synthetic charts, respectively.
Conclusions:
WHO Growth charts overdiagnose short stature by 12.4% (WHO 22.54% vs. Indian synthetic 10.15%) in an apparently normal population of under five children. Use of regional growth charts may reduce the need to unnecessarily investigate normal children.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Nature and Nurture
Regression Toward the Mean
Variation: Normal Distribution, Range, and Standard Deviation
Traditional Level Of Health Care System
The preventive healthcare service includes tests for screening. Preventive health care services include identifying and reducing disease risk...

