Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2025

A Component-resolved Diagnostic Approach for a Study on Grass Pollen Allergens in Chinese Southerners with Allergic Rhinitis and/or Asthma
Published on: June 4, 2017
Specificity and sensitivity of questionnaires in the diagnosis of allergic diseases
Edyta Krzych-Fałta1, Oksana Wojas2, Filip Raciborski2
1Department of Basic Nursing, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Introduction:
Due to their widespread character, allergic diseases are a significant challenge in the field of public health and clinical practice. The available clinimetric tools, including standardized and validated questionnaires, play an important role in determining the incidence of a particular allergic disease in the targeted population.
Aim:
We attempted to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of modified and standardized questions from the ISSAC and ECRHS questionnaires in the diagnosis of allergic diseases.
Material And Methods:
We examined a total number of 1,000 respondents classified into the following age groups: 6-10, 11-15, and 16-19 years. Modified ISSAC and ECRHS questionnaires were implemented to verify the effectiveness of diagnosing allergic diseases.
Results:
Among individuals aged from 6 to 10 years, the specificity and sensitivity of diagnosing allergic rhinitis were 0.84 and 0.50; for asthma 0.64 and 0.85, for atopic dermatitis 0.90 and 0.42, and for food allergy 0.42 and 0.85, respectively. Respondents aged 11-15 years presented the following values of specificity and sensitivity: 0.83 and 0.46 for allergic rhinitis, 0.45 and 0.87 for asthma, 0.89 and 0.43 for atopic dermatitis, and 0.61 and 0.80 for food allergies, respectively. Finally, among patients from 16 to 19 years of age, the specificity and sensitivity of validated questionnaires as assessment tools in diagnosing allergic rhinitis were 0.91 and 0.39, for asthma 0.35 and 0.89, for atopic dermatitis 1.0 and 0.45, and for food allergy 0.67 and 0.85, respectively.
Conclusions:
The modified and standardized questions included in the ISSAC and ECRHS questionnaires are a valuable tool for determining the scale of allergic diseases. However, as these clinical tools are characterized by varying specificity and sensitivity, it is recommended that such tests be verified by clinical examination.
Related Concept Videos
Allergic Reactions
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Hypersensitivities
Types of Hypersensitivities
Hypersensitivity reactions are categorized into four types: Type 1, Type 2, Type 3, and Type 4. Each type has a distinct mechanism...
Asthma-II: Pathophysiology and Classification
Additionally, environmental and genetic factors play crucial roles in determining an individual's susceptibility to asthma and the severity of their condition.
Critical processes in asthma pathophysiology include:
Allergic Drug Reactions

