Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2025

Spatial Separation of Molecular Conformers and Clusters
Published on: January 9, 2014
σ-Electrons rather than π-Electrons Inducing Sensitive Nonlinear Optical Responses in Planar and Quasi-Planar Boron
1School of Materials Science and Physics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province 221116, China.
Abstract:
Geometries and electronic structures of planar and quasi-planar boron clusters resemble those of aromatic hydrocarbons, providing opportunities for designing novel nonlinear optical materials. However, the nonlinear optical properties, optical-response mechanisms, and optimal optical-response geometries of boron clusters remain unclear. Accordingly, this study addresses these uncertainties. Boron clusters exhibit good nonlinear optical performance, significantly surpassing that of aromatic hydrocarbons of comparable size. An analysis method based on electron density decomposition is proposed to quantitatively determine the contributions of σ- and π-electrons to the optical responses. The findings reveal that σ-electrons dominate the nonlinear optical responses in planar boron clusters owing to their delocalized characteristics, in marked contrast to aromatic hydrocarbons. Using boron isomers as model systems, boron nanoribbons were confirmed to provide optimal nonlinear optical performances. This study offers valuable insights into the nonlinear optical behaviors of planar and quasi-planar boron clusters, substantially enhancing the rational design of novel nonlinear optical materials.
Related Concept Videos
Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals I
Exceptions to the Octet Rule
VSEPR Theory and the Effect of Lone Pairs
π Electron Effects on Chemical Shift: Overview
VSEPR Theory and the Basic Shapes
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...

