Prognostic impact of 1-year permanent pacemaker implantation after mitral valve surgery with the Cox-maze procedure

Jun Ho Lee1, Yun Jin Kim2,3, Ji Eon Kim1

  • 1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Insights

Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after mitral valve surgery with the Cox-maze procedure does not increase mortality or stroke risk. However, PPM is linked to a higher risk of infective endocarditis (IE).

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Cardiac Surgery
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Mitral valve (MV) surgery combined with the Cox-maze procedure is a common treatment for atrial fibrillation.
  • The need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation post-surgery can impact patient outcomes.
  • Understanding the long-term prognostic implications of PPM is crucial for clinical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the prognostic impact of early permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after mitral valve (MV) surgery with the Cox-maze procedure.
  • To assess the association of PPM with long-term overall mortality, infective endocarditis (IE), and ischaemic stroke.
  • To determine the safety and efficacy of the Cox-maze procedure in conjunction with potential PPM needs.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study utilizing South Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) data (2005-2020).
  • 10,127 patients undergoing MV surgery with Cox-maze procedure were analyzed.
  • Patients were grouped into PPM (implanted within 1 year) and non-PPM groups; statistical analysis included Cox proportional hazards regression and Fine-Gray competing risk models.

Main Results:

  • 1.76% of patients required PPM implantation.
  • No significant difference in overall mortality or ischaemic stroke risk was observed between PPM and non-PPM groups.
  • PPM implantation was significantly associated with an increased risk of infective endocarditis (HR: 2.015, P=0.010).

Conclusions:

  • Early PPM implantation following MV surgery with the Cox-maze procedure does not adversely affect long-term mortality or stroke risk.
  • A notable increase in the risk of infective endocarditis is associated with PPM implantation.
  • The Cox-maze procedure remains a recommended option for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing MV surgery.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction01:27

Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction

IntroductionThe mitral valve, one of the heart's four valves, regulates blood flow. These valves have flaps that open and close to direct blood properly through the heart and body. During each heartbeat, the flaps open for blood to pass through and seal shut to prevent backflow. Specifically, the mitral valve opens to allow blood flow from the heart's upper left chamber to the lower left chamber. It then closes securely as the lower left chamber contracts to pump blood to the body, preventing...
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management01:22

Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management

IntroductionA range of clinical features characterizes Mitral Valve Prolapse (MVP), but it is important to note that many individuals with MVP are asymptomatic and may remain so throughout their lives. For those who do exhibit symptoms, the following are the key clinical features:Palpitations: This is a common symptom where individuals feel an irregular or rapid heartbeat. Palpitations in MVP are often due to arrhythmias such as premature ventricular contractions or supraventricular tachycardia.
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management01:25

Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is characterized by retrograde blood circulation from the left ventricle into the left atrium due to inadequate mitral valve closure. The severity of the condition, symptoms, and underlying cause determine treatment strategies.Monitoring and Pharmacological TreatmentPatients with mild to moderate MR typically do not need immediate intervention but regular monitoring to assess progression and guide treatment. Patients with mild MR should have an echocardiogram every 3-5...
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction01:22

Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction

Mitral Valve Stenosis (MVS) is a heart condition where the mitral valve narrows, impeding blood circulation from the left atrium to the left ventricle. The etiology and pathophysiology of this condition are multifaceted, leading to a cascade of cardiovascular complications.Causes of Mitral Valve StenosisRheumatic Heart Disease: It is the main cause of mitral valve stenosis, particularly in developing nations. This condition arises from rheumatic fever, an inflammatory illness resulting from...
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests01:23

Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests

Mitral stenosis is a heart condition in which the mitral valve, which allows blood to flow from the left atrium to the left ventricle, becomes narrowed or stenotic. This narrowing hinders blood flow and leads to clinical symptoms requiring specific medical evaluations and management strategies. The following overview outlines the clinical symptoms, assessments, diagnostic findings, prevention methods, and treatments for mitral stenosis.Clinical ManifestationsDyspnea (shortness of breath): This...
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management01:26

Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management

Mitral stenosis, a condition marked by the narrowing of the mitral valve, necessitates an integrated approach for effective management. This approach includes preventative measures, medical therapy, and surgical interventions to reduce symptoms and prevent complications.PreventionPrevention of mitral stenosis primarily focuses on reducing the incidence of bacterial infections, particularly streptococcal infections, which can lead to rheumatic fever and subsequent valvular damage. Timely...