Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Prognostic impact of 1-year permanent pacemaker implantation after mitral valve surgery with the Cox-maze procedure
Jun Ho Lee1, Yun Jin Kim2,3, Ji Eon Kim1
1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Insights
Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after mitral valve surgery with the Cox-maze procedure does not increase mortality or stroke risk. However, PPM is linked to a higher risk of infective endocarditis (IE).
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Mitral valve (MV) surgery combined with the Cox-maze procedure is a common treatment for atrial fibrillation.
- The need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation post-surgery can impact patient outcomes.
- Understanding the long-term prognostic implications of PPM is crucial for clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prognostic impact of early permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after mitral valve (MV) surgery with the Cox-maze procedure.
- To assess the association of PPM with long-term overall mortality, infective endocarditis (IE), and ischaemic stroke.
- To determine the safety and efficacy of the Cox-maze procedure in conjunction with potential PPM needs.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study utilizing South Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) data (2005-2020).
- 10,127 patients undergoing MV surgery with Cox-maze procedure were analyzed.
- Patients were grouped into PPM (implanted within 1 year) and non-PPM groups; statistical analysis included Cox proportional hazards regression and Fine-Gray competing risk models.
Main Results:
- 1.76% of patients required PPM implantation.
- No significant difference in overall mortality or ischaemic stroke risk was observed between PPM and non-PPM groups.
- PPM implantation was significantly associated with an increased risk of infective endocarditis (HR: 2.015, P=0.010).
Conclusions:
- Early PPM implantation following MV surgery with the Cox-maze procedure does not adversely affect long-term mortality or stroke risk.
- A notable increase in the risk of infective endocarditis is associated with PPM implantation.
- The Cox-maze procedure remains a recommended option for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing MV surgery.
Objectives:
This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation within the first year after mitral valve (MV) surgery combined with the Cox-maze procedure, focusing on long-term outcomes, including overall mortality, infective endocarditis (IE) and ischaemic stroke.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) in South Korea, identifying 10 127 patients who underwent MV surgery with the Cox-maze procedure between 2005 and 2020. Patients were classified into the PPM and non-PPM groups based on PPM implantation within 1 year postoperatively. The primary outcome was overall mortality, and secondary outcomes included risk factors for overall mortality, IE and ischaemic stroke. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression and Fine-Gray competing risk models were utilized for statistical analysis.
Results:
Of the total cohort, 178 patients (1.76%) underwent PPM implantation. The overall mortality during the follow-up period was 20.5%, with no significant difference between the PPM and non-PPM groups. PPM implantation was not a significant risk factor for overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.825; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.598-1.140; P = 0.244) or ischaemic stroke. However, PPM implantation was associated with a significantly increased risk of IE (HR, 2.015; 95% CI 1.179-3.442; P = 0.010).
Conclusions:
PPM implantation within the first year after MV surgery with the Cox-maze procedure does not significantly impact long-term mortality or ischaemic stroke risk but is associated with an increased risk of IE. The Cox-maze procedure remains advisable for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing MV surgery.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management

