Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
Opportune moments for task interruptions: examining the cognitive mechanisms underlying interruption-timing effects
Patricia Hirsch1, Luca Moretti1, Benedikt Leichtmann2,3
1Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Task interruptions negatively impact performance, especially when occurring mid-sequence. This study found that interruptions before the third subtask caused the highest performance costs, regardless of task sequence type.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Task Interruption Research
Background:
- Task interruptions during high mental workload are known to be more detrimental than during low mental workload.
- Understanding the precise timing of interruptions and their impact on performance is crucial for optimizing task design and minimizing errors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effects of interruption timing on primary task performance using a theory-driven approach to define mental workload.
- To examine how different interruption points within a sequential task influence resumption costs.
Main Methods:
- Participants completed a six-subtask primary task, with interruptions occurring before the second, third, or fourth subtask.
- Task sequences were structured as either lag-2 repetition triplets or lag-2 switch triplets to manipulate mental workload and subtask inhibition.
- Resumption costs were measured by comparing performance on subtasks after an interruption to performance on the same subtasks in non-interrupted sequences.
Main Results:
- A significant interruption-timing effect was observed, with higher resumption costs when interruptions occurred before the third subtask.
- Interruptions before the second and fourth subtasks resulted in lower resumption costs compared to interruptions before the third subtask.
- The observed interruption-timing effect on resumption costs did not differ between lag-2 repetition and lag-2 switch sequences.
Conclusions:
- The timing of task interruptions significantly influences performance recovery, with mid-sequence interruptions being particularly disruptive.
- Findings suggest that the cognitive load associated with task sequencing, particularly overcoming subtask inhibition, plays a key role in interruption costs.
- Results are discussed in relation to memory retrieval and context reconstruction theories to explain performance decrements after interruptions.
More Related Videos
06:45Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Framing Effects
Reason and Intuition