Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2025

Establishment and Characterization of Three Afatinib-resistant Lung Adenocarcinoma PC-9 Cell Lines Developed with Increasing Doses of Afatinib
Published on: June 26, 2019
First-line treatment for advanced or metastatic EGFR mutation-positive non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a
1Department of Oncology, Bishan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Background:
Several head-to-head meta-analyses have compared the efficacy and safety of different first-line treatments in patients with EGFR mutation-positive (M+) advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsq-NSCLC). However, there is a lack of comprehensive evaluation encompassing multiple treatment strategies. Our objective is to conduct a network meta-analysis that includes various treatment modalities, enabling both direct and indirect comparisons for a more thorough assessment.
Methods:
We conducted a search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception until May 8, 2024, to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), while secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR) and grade 3 or higher adverse events (≥3AEs). Stata 15.0 and R 4.3.2 software were utilized for the network meta-analysis.
Results:
A total of 30 RCTs, comprising 8654 participants, were included. The study encompassed the following 19 treatments: Chemotherapy; Afatinib; Afatinib + Cetuximab; Apatinib + Gefitinib; Befotertinib; Cetuximab + Chemotherapy; Erlotinib; Erlotinib + Bevacizumab; Erlotinib + Chemotherapy; Gefitinib; Gefitinib + Chemotherapy; Gefitinib + Olaparib; Icotinib; Icotinib + Chemotherapy; Lazertinib; Naquotinib; Osimertinib; Osimertinib + Bevacizumab; Osimertinib + Chemotherapy. The network meta-analysis results indicated that, in terms of PFS, Osimertinib + Chemotherapy (SUCRAs: 93.4%) and Osimertinib (SUCRAs: 84.61%) were the most effective. Regarding OS, Lazertinib (SUCRAs: 89.72%), Gefitinib (SUCRAs: 72.07%), and Osimertinib + Chemotherapy (SUCRAs: 70.74%) emerged as the top three options. Afatinib (SUCRAs: 92.27%) was associated with the best ORR improvement. For ≥3AEs, Afatinib (SUCRAs: 74.93%) and Osimertinib (SUCRAs: 69.42%) were likely the best choices.
Conclusion:
Current evidence suggests that, considering both survival and safety, Osimertinib stands out as the preferred first-line treatment for untreated EGFR M + advanced or metastatic nsq-NSCLC. Notably, the combination of Osimertinib with chemotherapy demonstrated superior survival benefits. However, due to the limitations in the number and quality of included studies, these conclusions await further validation through more high-quality research.
Systematic Review Registration:
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024562981, identifier CRD42024562981.
Insights
Osimertinib is the preferred first-line treatment for EGFR M+ non-small cell lung cancer, offering superior survival benefits, especially when combined with chemotherapy. Further research is needed to validate these findings.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsq-NSCLC) with EGFR mutations requires effective first-line treatments.
- Existing meta-analyses lack a comprehensive comparison of multiple treatment strategies.
- Network meta-analysis is needed to evaluate diverse treatment modalities for EGFR M+ nsq-NSCLC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a network meta-analysis comparing efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for EGFR M+ advanced/metastatic nsq-NSCLC.
- To enable direct and indirect comparisons of various treatment strategies.
- To provide a thorough assessment of treatment options.
Main Methods:
- Systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases until May 8, 2024.
- Inclusion of 30 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 8654 participants.
- Primary endpoints: progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); Secondary outcomes: objective response rate (ORR) and grade 3+ adverse events (≥3AEs).
Main Results:
- Osimertinib + Chemotherapy (SUCRAs: 93.4%) and Osimertinib (SUCRAs: 84.61%) showed superior PFS.
- Lazertinib (SUCRAs: 89.72%), Gefitinib (SUCRAs: 72.07%), and Osimertinib + Chemotherapy (SUCRAs: 70.74%) were top for OS.
- Afatinib demonstrated the best ORR (SUCRAs: 92.27%) and was a favorable choice for ≥3AEs (SUCRAs: 74.93%).
Conclusions:
- Osimertinib is a preferred first-line treatment for untreated EGFR M+ advanced/metastatic nsq-NSCLC, balancing survival and safety.
- Combination of Osimertinib with chemotherapy offers enhanced survival benefits.
- Further high-quality research is recommended due to study limitations.
More Related Videos
07:59Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: September 8, 2023
09:38Establishing Dual Resistance to EGFR-TKI and MET-TKI in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells In Vitro with a 2-step Dose-escalation Procedure
Published on: August 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers
TKIs, such as imatinib (Gleevec), are particularly effective in tackling the growth and mitogenic factors that become upregulated in PAH patients. These factors contribute to the...
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Endothelin Receptor Antagonists
ETs are synthesized through a complex sequence of enzymatic steps, primarily involving an enzyme referred to as endothelin-converting enzyme...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...