Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

115
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
115
Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

58
The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
58
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

82
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
82
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

26
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
26
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

38
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
38
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

81
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
81

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Auxiliary data as surrogates for SCORE2 risk calculator inputs - design and methodology of the Frauenherzen study in apparently healthy women aged 40-69 years.

Gynecologic and obstetric investigation·2026
Same author

Applying the 5P framework to improve cancer prevention in European health systems.

Journal of public health policy·2026
Same author

Environmental and occupational cancer: highlighting research contributions from the IARC on its 60th anniversary.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs·2026
Same author

Risk of Subsequent Primary Melanoma in 68,002 five-year survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer in Europe: The PanCareSurFup cohort study.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same author

PROMs: Patient related or patient centred? A bridge between Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and clinical ethics in the context of a cohort of gynaeco-oncological patients analysed by qualitative semi- structured interviews.

Journal of patient-reported outcomes·2026
Same author

Improving Registration and Dataflows Between Pediatric Oncology Clinics and the Childhood Cancer Registry of Switzerland: Protocol for SwissPedCancer Quality Assurance Study.

JMIR research protocols·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K

Comparing imputation approaches to handle systematically missing inputs in risk calculators.

Anja Mühlemann1, Philip Stange1, Antoine Faul1

  • 1Institute of Mathematical Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

PLOS Digital Health
|January 30, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces probabilistic imputation to estimate disease risk when input data is missing. It provides valuable risk indications for medical practice, even with incomplete patient information.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Risk calculators are vital for disease prediction but often face challenges with missing input variables in clinical practice.
  • Systematically missing data, such as from blood draws, can hinder the accurate application of these risk assessment tools.
  • Existing methods may not adequately account for the uncertainty introduced by missing predictor variables.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare deterministic and probabilistic imputation methods for surrogate risk predictions when input variables are systematically missing.
  • To evaluate the performance of these imputation approaches in handling uncertainty and providing risk estimations.
  • To assess the utility of imputation methods for classifying patients into risk groups.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of several deterministic and probabilistic imputation techniques to predict missing risk calculator inputs.
  • Utilizing scoring techniques, specifically Brier and CRPS scores, for forecast evaluation.
  • Application of the SCORE2 risk calculator for cardiovascular disease using a dataset from 359 women, mimicking missing blood lipid and blood pressure data.
  • Comparison with established imputation techniques like Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE).

Main Results:

  • Probabilistic imputation provides probabilistic predictions of disease risk, accounting for uncertainty from missing inputs.
  • Scoring rules like Brier and CRPS were used to evaluate and compare imputation methods.
  • The study demonstrated how probabilistic imputation can inform risk group classification and aid in sample size considerations.
  • Probabilistic imputation of missing variables (blood lipids, blood pressure) was computed for the SCORE2 calculator.

Conclusions:

  • Imputation methods, particularly probabilistic imputation, can provide valuable first indications of risk distribution when input data is incomplete.
  • These approaches offer a practical solution for medical practice where fully informed risk calculations may not be feasible.
  • Probabilistic imputation enhances the usability of risk calculators by addressing the common issue of missing data, aiding clinical decision-making and study design.