Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
A qualitative process evaluation of SBIRT implementation in pediatric trauma centers using the Science to Service
Kelli Scott1, Michael J Mello2, Geraldine Almonte3
1Center for Dissemination and Implementation Science, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 633 N St Clair Street, Chicago, IL, USA. kelli.scott@northwestern.edu.
Trauma centers found the Science-to-Service Laboratory (SSL) helpful for implementing Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT). However, direct care staff need more engagement in SSL elements for successful adolescent substance use intervention.
Area of Science:
- Implementation Science
- Pediatric Trauma Care
- Substance Use Intervention
Background:
- Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) is an evidence-based practice for adolescent substance use.
- Pediatric trauma centers face barriers implementing SBIRT despite mandates.
- The IAMSBIRT study implemented SBIRT across 10 centers using the Science-to-Service Laboratory (SSL) strategy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess trauma center staff preferences and experiences with the SSL implementation strategy.
- To identify strengths and areas for improvement in SBIRT implementation support.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of didactic training, performance feedback, and coaching.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative exit interviews were conducted with nurses, social workers, and site leaders.
- Interviews were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
- Data analysis involved directed content analysis and theme translation.
Main Results:
- Staff found SSL elements generally high quality and helpful for SBIRT implementation.
- Key strengths and areas for improvement were identified in the preparation and SSL elements.
- Performance feedback and coaching were often limited to leadership, hindering non-leader troubleshooting.
Conclusions:
- Discrepancies exist in SSL strategy experience between leadership and direct care staff.
- Modifications to the SSL strategy are needed to increase direct care staff engagement.
- Enhanced engagement of frontline staff is crucial for successful SBIRT implementation in pediatric trauma.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Introduction to Statistical Process Control

