Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2025

Profiling Sensitivity to Targeted Therapies in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Patient-Derived Organoids
Published on: November 22, 2021
Assessing patient risk, benefit and outcomes in drug development: an observational study of regorafenib clinical
Brody Dennis1, Chance Bratten1, Griffin K Hughes1
1Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Objective:
Our objective of this study was to analyse all oncological clinical trials using regorafenib to create a complete risk/benefit profile for the drug.
Background:
Creating a novel chemotherapy is costly both in time and capital spent for drug manufacturers. To regenerate what they've spent, drug manufacturers may attempt to repurpose their medications for new indications via clinical trials. To fully understand the risk/benefits in comparison to a drug's efficacy, a pooled analysis must be completed.
Methods:
We screened PubMed, Embase, Cochrane (CENTRAL) and ClinicalTrials.gov for trials of regorafenib used to treat solid cancers. Next, we extracted median progression-free survival and overall survival in months, adverse event rates and objective response rate (ORR). Studies were deemed positive, negative or indeterminate based on their pre-specified endpoints and tolerability.
Results:
56 clinical trials were included in our final sample, with 4960 total participants across 13 indications. Most studies (44 of 56; 78.75%) were non-blinded, and a majority were non-randomised (41 of 56; 73.21%). Trials for colorectal cancer started out as positive but became more negative over time. Cumulative risk to patients increased over time while ORR stayed consistently low.
Conclusions:
Our findings suggest that since regorafenib's original Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, the risk profile for its original indication increased. The amount of non-randomised, single-arm trials in our sample size was concerning, indicating that higher quality research must be conducted. Our results propose that regorafenib's efficacy and safety may be more impactful in cancers other than its FDA approvals.
Insights
Regorafenib trials show increasing patient risk and low objective response rates over time, especially in colorectal cancer. Higher quality research is needed to clarify its true risk/benefit profile.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Drug Repurposing
Background:
- Drug development is costly, prompting pharmaceutical companies to repurpose existing medications for new uses through clinical trials.
- A comprehensive pooled analysis is essential to evaluate the risk-benefit profile against a drug's efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a comprehensive analysis of all oncological clinical trials involving regorafenib.
- To establish a complete risk-benefit profile for regorafenib in cancer treatment.
Main Methods:
- Systematic screening of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov for regorafenib trials in solid cancers.
- Extraction of key data including progression-free survival, overall survival, adverse event rates, and objective response rate (ORR).
- Classification of studies as positive, negative, or indeterminate based on pre-specified endpoints and tolerability.
Main Results:
- Analysis included 56 trials with 4960 participants across 13 indications; 78.75% were non-blinded and 73.21% were non-randomized.
- Colorectal cancer trials initially showed positive outcomes but trended negative over time, with increasing patient risk and consistently low ORR.
- Cumulative patient risk rose over time, while objective response rates remained consistently low across studies.
Conclusions:
- Regorafenib's risk profile has increased since its initial FDA approval for its primary indication.
- A significant proportion of non-randomized, single-arm trials were identified, highlighting the need for higher-quality research.
- Regorafenib's efficacy and safety may be more favorable in cancers beyond its currently approved indications.
More Related Videos
08:12Detection of a Circulating MicroRNA Custom Panel in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Published on: March 14, 2019
09:29Development and Maintenance of a Preclinical Patient Derived Tumor Xenograft Model for the Investigation of Novel Anti-Cancer Therapies
Published on: September 30, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups