Assessing patient risk, benefit and outcomes in drug development: an observational study of regorafenib clinical

Brody Dennis1, Chance Bratten1, Griffin K Hughes1

  • 1Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

BMJ Oncology
|January 31, 2025
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Regorafenib trials show increasing patient risk and low objective response rates over time, especially in colorectal cancer. Higher quality research is needed to clarify its true risk/benefit profile.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Pharmacology
  • Drug Repurposing

Background:

  • Drug development is costly, prompting pharmaceutical companies to repurpose existing medications for new uses through clinical trials.
  • A comprehensive pooled analysis is essential to evaluate the risk-benefit profile against a drug's efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a comprehensive analysis of all oncological clinical trials involving regorafenib.
  • To establish a complete risk-benefit profile for regorafenib in cancer treatment.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic screening of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov for regorafenib trials in solid cancers.
  • Extraction of key data including progression-free survival, overall survival, adverse event rates, and objective response rate (ORR).
  • Classification of studies as positive, negative, or indeterminate based on pre-specified endpoints and tolerability.

Main Results:

  • Analysis included 56 trials with 4960 participants across 13 indications; 78.75% were non-blinded and 73.21% were non-randomized.
  • Colorectal cancer trials initially showed positive outcomes but trended negative over time, with increasing patient risk and consistently low ORR.
  • Cumulative patient risk rose over time, while objective response rates remained consistently low across studies.

Conclusions:

  • Regorafenib's risk profile has increased since its initial FDA approval for its primary indication.
  • A significant proportion of non-randomized, single-arm trials were identified, highlighting the need for higher-quality research.
  • Regorafenib's efficacy and safety may be more favorable in cancers beyond its currently approved indications.

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
114
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
6.6K
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
321
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
78
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
131