Gluteal Augmentation: A Historical Perspective on Aesthetic Practice

Area of Science:

• Cosmetic surgery
• Aesthetic medicine
• Body contouring procedures

Background:

• Buttock augmentation is increasingly popular, necessitating a clear understanding of available techniques.
• Diverse methods exist, each with unique aesthetic outcomes and patient considerations.

Purpose of the Study:

• To provide a detailed comparative review of four major buttock augmentation techniques.
• To assess the benefits and limitations of gluteal implants, Brazilian butt lift (BBL), intramuscular polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and hyaluronic acid fillers.

Main Methods:

• Comprehensive literature review of clinical studies, case reports, and expert opinions.
• Evaluation of techniques based on effectiveness, safety, recovery, and patient satisfaction.
• Synthesis of data for a comparative analysis of each method.

Main Results:

• Gluteal implants: predictable volume, surgical risks, long recovery.
• BBL: natural results, body contouring, risks of fat embolism/reabsorption.
• PMMA fillers: permanent, minimally invasive, difficult removal.
• Hyaluronic acid fillers: reversible, minimally invasive, requires maintenance, migration risk.

Conclusions:

• Each buttock augmentation technique presents specific advantages and disadvantages.
• Individualized patient assessment and practitioner expertise are crucial for optimal outcomes.
• This review aids informed decision-making in buttock augmentation procedures.