Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2025

Oxygenation-sensitive Cardiac MRI with Vasoactive Breathing Maneuvers for the Non-invasive Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
Published on: August 17, 2022
Goal-Directed Versus Self-Directed Valsalva Maneuver in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy on Cardiac Myosin
Aakash Bavishi1, Marybeth Soutar2, Margaret Kurnides2
1Division of Cardiology, University of Illinois-Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Insights
The goal-directed Valsalva (GDV) maneuver provides a more accurate assessment of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients than the self-directed Valsalva (SDV). GDV improves management of obstructive HCM on mavacamten by reclassifying severity and reducing follow-up tests.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Pharmacology
Background:
- The Valsalva maneuver is critical for assessing left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
- Traditional self-directed Valsalva (SDV) instructions are vague, leading to inaccurate LVOT gradient measurements.
- A standardized goal-directed Valsalva (GDV) maneuver offers objective and reproducible results for LVOT gradient assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical impact of GDV versus SDV in obstructive HCM patients treated with mavacamten.
- To evaluate how different Valsalva maneuver techniques affect LVOT gradient measurements in patients on cardiac myosin inhibitor therapy.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving patients with obstructive HCM undergoing mavacamten therapy.
- Patients performed both SDV and GDV maneuvers, with peak LVOT gradient (pLVOTg) measured at rest and during each maneuver.
- Transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs) were used to assess pLVOTg.
Main Results:
- Mean pLVOTg was significantly higher with GDV (31 mm Hg) compared to SDV (24 mm Hg) in initial post-mavacamten TTEs.
- Fewer patients maintained a pLVOTg ≤20 mm Hg with GDV (43%) versus SDV (63%).
- GDV was associated with fewer medication dose reductions and reduced TTE follow-up frequency.
Conclusions:
- GDV significantly alters patient management in obstructive HCM on mavacamten by more accurately reclassifying disease severity.
- Utilizing GDV can prevent unnecessary medication dose reductions and decrease the need for frequent TTE follow-ups.
- Standardized GDV improves the precision of LVOT gradient assessment, crucial for optimizing cardiac myosin inhibitor therapy.
Background:
The Valsalva maneuver is essential in evaluating left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Traditionally, a self-directed Valsalva (SDV) maneuver is taught to patients using vague instructions such as "bear down." SDV is often not performed correctly leading to variable results and underestimation of the true provocable LVOT gradient. Alternatively, a standardized, goal-directed Valsalva (GDV) approach by maintaining an intraoral pressure 40 mm Hg for 10 seconds or more provides a more objective, reproducible result. Accurate and reproducible LVOT gradient is key in the mavacamten algorithm for dose titration.
Objectives:
The objective was to evaluate the clinical impact of the GDV compared to SDV in patients with obstructive HCM on mavacamten.
Methods:
In this prospective study, patients with obstructive HCM on mavacamten performed both an SDV and GDV. Peak LVOT gradient (pLVOTg) was measured at rest and using both provocative SDV and GDV maneuvers.
Results:
A total of 69 patients were included with 203 total transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs). Among initial postmavacamten TTEs, mean pLVOTg was significantly higher with GDV vs SDV (31 mm Hg vs 24 mm Hg, P < 0.01). When compared to SDV, GDV was associated with fewer patients maintaining pLVOTg ≤20 mm Hg (29 [43%] vs 43 [63%], P < 0.01) which decreased medication reductions and reduced TTE follow-up in the GDV cohort.
Conclusions:
GDV can significantly alter patient management in patients with obstructive HCM on cardiac myosin inhibitor therapy by reclassifying disease severity, preventing unnecessary dose reductions in medications, and reducing the burden of frequent TTEs.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents

