Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2025

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
Response to the critiques (and encouragements) on our critique of motivation constructs
Kou Murayama1,2, Hayley Jach1,3
1Hector Research Institute of Education Sciences and Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany k.murayama@uni-tuebingen.de hayley.jach@unimelb.edu.auhttps://motivationsciencelab.com/.
Abstract:
The target article argued that motivation constructs are treated as black boxes and called for work that specifies the mental computational processes underlying motivated behavior. In response to critical commentaries, we clarify our philosophical standpoint, elaborate on the meaning of mental computational processes and why past work was not sufficient, and discuss the opportunities to expand the scope of the framework.
Related Concept Videos
Drive-Reduction Theory: Push Theory of Motivation
Humanistic Psychology
This approach...
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation
The theory differentiates between...
Fundamental Attribution Error
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...

