Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ovarian Cycle01:27

Ovarian Cycle

945
The menstrual cycle includes a critical component known as the ovarian cycle, which undergoes two main phases each month—the follicular phase and the luteal phase. The follicular phase is variable and averaging around 14 days. Ovulation, triggered by a surge in luteinizing hormone (LH), marks the transition between the two phases. The second phase, the luteal phase, is relatively consistent, lasting approximately 14 days, and is marked by the activity of the corpus luteum. While a cycle...
945

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessment of Sit-to-Stand Transfers during Daily Life Using an Accelerometer on the Lower Back.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2020
Same author

The Impact of Reducing the Number of Wearable Devices on Measuring Gait in Parkinson Disease: Noninterventional Exploratory Study.

JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies·2020
Same author

Target-Specific Action Classification for Automated Assessment of Human Motor Behavior from Video.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2019
Same author

Attention to a threat-related feature does not interfere with concurrent attentive feature selection.

Psychophysiology·2019
Same author

What does the dot-probe task measure? A reverse correlation analysis of electrocortical activity.

Psychophysiology·2018
Same author

Responding to emotional scenes: effects of response outcome and picture repetition on reaction times and the late positive potential.

Cognition & emotion·2016
Same journal

Correction: Confidence Measurement Metrics in Multimodal Large Language Models for Ultrasound-Based Radiology Cases: Comparative Evaluation Study of Self-Reported, Consistency-Based, and Hybrid Methods.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same journal

Centering Equity During Health Technology Innovation: Scoping Review of Methods and Research Adjustments to Promote Inclusive Coproduction.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same journal

Comparative Effectiveness of AI-Assisted Telerehabilitation, Telerehabilitation, In-Person Care, and Usual Care for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same journal

Effectiveness of WeChat Public Account Intervention Based on the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model Among College Students With Internet Addiction: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same journal

Are Traditional Registries Becoming Obsolete in the Modern Digital Health Ecosystem?

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same journal

Detecting and Preventing Fraudulent Participation in Qualitative Research: Content Analysis of Two Multisite Studies.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Primatology Through Germ Cell Research and Genetic Modification Techniques
06:17

Author Spotlight: Advancing Primatology Through Germ Cell Research and Genetic Modification Techniques

Published on: July 5, 2024

949

Oura Ring as a Tool for Ovulation Detection: Validation Analysis.

Nina Thigpen1, Shyamal Patel1, Xi Zhang1

  • 1Oura Ring, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Journal of Medical Internet Research
|January 31, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Oura Ring

Keywords:
body temperaturecalendar methoddetectiondigital medicinefertilitymHealthmenstrual cyclesmobile healthnonhormonal contraceptionovulationphysiologyreproductive healthwearablewomen’s health

More Related Videos

Rodent Estrous Cycle Monitoring Utilizing Vaginal Lavage: No Such Thing As a Normal Cycle
09:05

Rodent Estrous Cycle Monitoring Utilizing Vaginal Lavage: No Such Thing As a Normal Cycle

Published on: August 30, 2021

7.3K
Aortic Ring Assay
09:12

Aortic Ring Assay

Published on: November 24, 2009

31.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Primatology Through Germ Cell Research and Genetic Modification Techniques
06:17

Author Spotlight: Advancing Primatology Through Germ Cell Research and Genetic Modification Techniques

Published on: July 5, 2024

949
Rodent Estrous Cycle Monitoring Utilizing Vaginal Lavage: No Such Thing As a Normal Cycle
09:05

Rodent Estrous Cycle Monitoring Utilizing Vaginal Lavage: No Such Thing As a Normal Cycle

Published on: August 30, 2021

7.3K
Aortic Ring Assay
09:12

Aortic Ring Assay

Published on: November 24, 2009

31.1K

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Endocrinology
  • Wearable Technology
  • Fertility Tracking

Background:

  • The Oura Ring wearable device estimates ovulation dates using physiological data.
  • Ovulation date estimation aids fertility management and provides insights into reproductive health biomarkers.
  • Tracking follicular and luteal phase lengths is crucial for monitoring reproductive health.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the accuracy and limitations of the Oura Ring's physiology-based ovulation date estimation.
  • To compare the Oura Ring's performance against the traditional calendar method.
  • To evaluate performance across various cycle lengths, variability, and participant ages.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 1155 ovulatory cycles from 964 participants in the Oura Ring commercial database.
  • Ovulation prediction kits used as a benchmark for performance evaluation.
  • Statistical analysis including Fisher test and Mann-Whitney U test to compare accuracy and detection rates.

Main Results:

  • The Oura Ring's physiology method achieved 96.4% ovulation detection with a 1.26-day average error, significantly outperforming the calendar method (3.44-day error).
  • Superior accuracy was observed across all cycle lengths, variability, and age groups compared to the calendar method.
  • The physiology method showed decreased accuracy in abnormally long cycles but maintained reliability for users with irregular cycles.

Conclusions:

  • The Oura Ring's physiology method offers a significant improvement in ovulation date accuracy over the calendar method.
  • This technology provides a reliable tool for fertile window estimation, aiding conception or pregnancy prevention.
  • It serves as a low-effort solution for tracking key reproductive health biomarkers like phase lengths.