Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2025
Assessment of Spontaneous Alternation, Novel Object Recognition and Limb Clasping in Transgenic Mouse Models of Amyloid-β and Tau Neuropathology
Published on: May 28, 2017
Cognition Assessment with ICOPE-Monitor: Identifying Candidates for Novel Therapies
Emmanuel Gonzalez-Bautista1, Maria Soto2, Marie Fourteau3
1Clinical and Research Alzheimer's Disease Center (CMRR), CHU Toulouse, IHU HealthAge, Toulouse, France; Maintain Aging Research Team, Centre d'Epidémiologie et de Recherche en santé des POPulations, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Objective:
To describe the clinical performance of the cognition battery on Step 1 (CogStep1) as a screening tool to detect (1) individuals with objective cognitive impairment regardless of their Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) score, and specifically (2) to identify patients who could potentially benefit from anti-amyloid treatments. It was hypothesized that CogStep1 was sensitive enough to identify individuals with mild stages of cognitive deterioration compared with a comprehensive neuropsychological and clinical evaluation.
Design:
Cross-sectional study.
Setting And Participants:
Patients aged 60 and older referred to the Toulouse Memory Clinic.
Methods:
Participants underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological and clinical evaluation and were also screened with the integrated care in older people (ICOPE)-monitor Step 1 by trained health professionals a maximum of 6 months before their memory consultation. Objective cognitive impairment was defined as mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia, according to National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association criteria. A positive CogStep1 screening was considered if people had at least 1 mistake in the 3-word recall or the time orientation (weekday, month, year). Sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were estimated.
Results:
Among the 352 participants [54.8% women, mean age 76.5 (SD 6.7)], 78.1% had a positive screening for CogStep1, and 75.6% had objective cognitive impairment. The clinimetric properties of CogStep1 to detect objective cognitive impairment (vs those without) were sensitivity = 87.0 (95% CI, 82.3-90.8), specificity = 48.8 (95% CI, 37.9-59.9), AUROC = 0.68 (95% CI, 0.62-0.74), PPV = 83.8 (95% CI, 78.8-87.9), and NPV = 55.3 (95% CI, 43.4-66.7). We found similar values among individuals with MCI or mild dementia who could be potential users of new anti-amyloid drugs (MMSE score ≥ 20 or 22).
Conclusion And Implications:
CogStep1 demonstrated good sensitivity and PPV to identify objective cognitive impairment among older people referred to a memory clinic. Achieving excellent sensitivity and specificity values is challenging for a very short test. However, CogStep1 proved useful for risk-stratifying patients who can benefit from further cognitive assessment, biomarker measurements, and therapeutic management, especially in the context of new anti-amyloid therapies.
