Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

On-Chip Endothelial Inflammatory Phenotyping
Published on: July 21, 2012
Evaluation of inflammatory-thrombosis panel as a diagnostic tool for vascular Behçet's disease
Haoting Zhan1, Linlin Cheng1, Haizhen Chen2
1Department of Clinical Laboratory, State key Laboratory of Complex, Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Objectives:
Vascular Behçet's disease (VBD) is prevalent in 40% of BD, but lacks laboratory biomarker for timely diagnosis. We aimed to establish a diagnostic panel for discerning VBD and non-VBD patients and identify hemostatic-thrombotic markers most related to VBD pathogenesis using machine learning algorithm.
Objectives:
A total of 338 BD patients comprising 123 VBD and 215 non-VBD were enrolled. Twenty-six clinical and laboratory features selected from LassoCV were included in multiple classifier to choose the optimal model for VBD differentiation. The Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was employed to interpret the contribution of model features for VBD prediction. Logistic regression analysis and nomogram were conducted to screen risk factors of VBD.
Results:
Inflammatory (neutrophils%, NK cells, IL-6), hematological (hemoglobin, hemoglobin distribution width (HDW)) and thrombosis (activated partial thromboplastin clotting time (APTT), D-dimer) parameters were elevated in VBD. Then we chose top contributors from XGBoost model and performed ten-fold cross validation, the diagnostic accuracy of which exceeded 0.90. Utilizing SHAP method, we identified higher incidence of arterial thrombosis or aneurysm and deep vein thrombosis, upregulated NK cell count, HDW, APTT and D-dimer, downregulated reticulocyte%, B cell count, red blood cell distribution width, cellular hemoglobin (CH) and TNF-α would ultimately generate the phenotype of VBD. Severity, hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, CH, HDW, APTT and D-dimer were found as potential risk factors for vascular outcomes among BD.
Results:
Our study developed a well-performed model leveraging clinical and laboratory parameters for differentiating VBD. Inflammatory and thrombotic risk factors are potential contributors to VBD. Key Points • Inflammatory (neutrophils%, NK cells, IL-6), hematological (HGB, HDW) and thrombosis (APTT, D-dimer) parameters were elevated in VBD. • We firstly developed an inflammatory-thrombosis model as a diagnostic tool for VBD. • HGB, MCH, CH, HDW, APTT and D-dimer are potential risk factors for VBD.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System II: Inspection
Head and Neck
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation

