Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2025

Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors
Published on: January 25, 2018
Reasoning to Justify Eating Animals Varies With Age
Luke McGuire1, Tina Bagus2, Alexander G Carter1
1University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Abstract:
The present study examined the justifications used by children, adolescents, and adults to justify eating animals. Children (n = 100, Mage = 9.82, SD = 0.77, female n = 49) as compared to adolescents (n = 76, Mage = 14.0, SD = 1.62, female n = 36) and adults (n = 113, Mage = 44.1, SD = 14.4, female n = 54) were more ambivalent or opposed to eating animals, and they showed a distinct reasoning pattern. Children relied less on arguments about meat eating being natural or with to humane slaughter practices. These findings align with recent theoretical perspectives that reasoning may be used to counter cognitive dissonance arising from knowledge of food production systems.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development from Childhood into Adulthood
Schemata: Building Blocks of...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Piaget's Stage 4 of Cognitive Development
Abstract Reasoning and Hypothetical-Deductive Thinking
Unlike the concrete operational...

