Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Preventing and reducing burnout globally: a six continent thematic assessment.

Research connections·2026
Same author

'Oh, they can prevent It?': a structural agency framework for understanding HIV prevention among black women in community supervision programs.

Health & justice·2026
Same author

A Mixed Effects Model Analysis for Inpatient Falls Using Health Record Data From 72 Hospitals.

Journal of clinical nursing·2026
Same author

Exploring the effect of animal assisted therapy on pediatric anxiety during invasive procedures.

Journal of pediatric nursing·2025
Same author

A Sweet Reflection…. A Fond Farewell.

Journal of perianesthesia nursing : official journal of the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses·2025
Same author

Association of skin tone and pressure injury severity in an international prevalence survey sample.

Nursing outlook·2025
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence in Disaster Triage: Enhancing Emergency Nursing Practice Through Decision Support.

Journal of emergency nursing·2026
Same journal

Saving Lives Starts Early: Nurse-Led First Aid and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training for High School Students and Future Professionals.

Journal of emergency nursing·2026
Same journal

Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura in a 33-Year-Old Female Presenting to a Rural Emergency Department: A Case Report.

Journal of emergency nursing·2026
Same journal

Ethical Considerations for Triage in the Emergency Department: Special Treatment for Very Important Persons.

Journal of emergency nursing·2026
Same journal

Graphic Medicine: Using Comics for Science Communication and Health Education in Emergency Nursing.

Journal of emergency nursing·2026
Same journal

When the Chin and Tongue Double: Clues to Ludwig's Angina.

Journal of emergency nursing·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

10.6K

Predictive Performance of the KINDER 1 Fall Risk Assessment Tool in a Regional Health System.

Vallire Hooper, Cynthia M LaFond, Kristi Stephenson

    Journal of Emergency Nursing
    |February 1, 2025
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The KINDER 1 Fall Risk Assessment Tool shows good predictive performance in emergency departments, with 77.5% sensitivity and 75.8% specificity. Further research is recommended for comparison with other tools.

    Keywords:
    Emergency nursingFall risk assessment toolsKINDER 1Predictive validitySensitivitySpecificity

    More Related Videos

    Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
    07:31

    Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

    Published on: May 15, 2020

    7.0K
    Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights
    05:26

    Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights

    Published on: October 25, 2024

    876

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: May 10, 2026

    Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
    08:05

    Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

    Published on: April 6, 2020

    10.6K
    Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
    07:31

    Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

    Published on: May 15, 2020

    7.0K
    Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights
    05:26

    Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights

    Published on: October 25, 2024

    876

    Area of Science:

    • Emergency Medicine
    • Patient Safety
    • Clinical Assessment Tools

    Background:

    • Emergency departments (EDs) face challenges in fall risk assessment due to unique patient factors.
    • Existing inpatient fall risk tools have limited validation in the ED setting.
    • The KINDER 1 Fall Risk Assessment Tool was piloted to address this gap.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the predictive performance of the KINDER 1 Fall Risk Assessment Tool.
    • To assess the tool's accuracy in identifying fall risk in an emergency department population.

    Main Methods:

    • Retrospective cohort study design.
    • Data collected from 10 EDs during an electronic pilot of the KINDER 1 tool (November 2023 - April 2024).
    • Inclusion of adult ED visits with a completed KINDER 1 assessment; analysis of 64,811 assessments.

    Main Results:

    • The KINDER 1 tool demonstrated a sensitivity of 77.5% and specificity of 75.8%.
    • Fall prevalence in the analyzed cohort was 0.06%.
    • The study included 40 patient falls in the final analysis.

    Conclusions:

    • The KINDER 1 tool exhibits acceptable predictive performance for fall risk in the ED.
    • Further research is needed to compare KINDER 1 with other ED fall risk tools (Hester Davis Scale, Memorial ED Fall Risk Assessment Tool).
    • Investigating the usability of different tools for nurses in triage settings is recommended.